this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
48 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22268 readers
491 users here now

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to [email protected].

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or [email protected].

[email protected] is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we're all comrades here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know how to reply that fallacy, but i still don't know what kind of fallacy it is.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This type of fallacy is called the Smuglord's Appeal.

Nobody cares about fallacies unless they're in a debate club.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Reductio ad dipshitum

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Human as a virus mindset fallacy.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

KKKolonizer's gambit fallacy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Consumerist fallacy, maybe. It's very closely related to "If you don't like (product that does systemic harm) don't buy (product that does systemic harm), simple" thought terminating cliches.

It demands that an individual bear the sole responsibility for something much larger than any single individual's contribution or ability to change something.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I just kind of say "no" when someone says that kind of thing to me. Ralph Pootawn mindset

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

"Why? We have all their money and stuff here. We stole it so I wouldn't have to travel"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

I think it is a non squtor. Which I think is the category of most statements where the correct response is simply ppb