205
submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

About the Online Safety Act in the UK and the Digital Services Act in Europe

(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 weeks ago

Funny how freeze peach sublimates directly into censorship vapor the moment liberals lose their cultural hegemony.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Dude you're on the instance where it is forbidden in worldnews to say "Fuck (a particular country which will remain nameless)".

Literally the only one. You can say "Fuck the United States" or "Fuck Israel" everywhere on Lemmy, or near enough, which of course is as it should be. But if I start stepping on the wrong massive state actors' toes from one particular instance...

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The difference is that communists accept the need for censorship and are open about why some ideas need to be suppressed. However, liberals hypocritically claim to stand for free speech and claim this is the key differentiating factor between liberal democracies and socialist systems, but only tolerate speech that they deem acceptable.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago

The difference is that communists accept the need for censorship and are open about why some ideas need to be suppressed.

Because some ideas are so destructive to your whole model that they have to be suppressed, because these models in their practical application are often sort of un-defendable, and so the only option is to have secret police running around shooting dissidents.

It doesn't mean that liberal democracies don't fall into the exact same pattern, to some extent large or small. It is in the nature of human power struggle. It's not innate to any particular political system (or it is innate to all of them because they're all made of people). The difference is that we don't celebrate it or make excuses for it. We publish books about what a lie the government is telling, we have a constant struggle between the forces of freedom in the streets and the government trying to stamp it out. Sometimes different factions get the upper hand, or it switches.

The difference, as you brilliantly demonstrated here, is that some of the most thickheaded of communist supporters get themselves turned around sufficiently that they start supporting the government trying to stamp it out. Most sensible people, when the government tells them that some ideas need to be suppressed, and they need to imprison or shoot anyone who's opposing their power, can figure out that's a bad thing. You apparently cannot.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
205 points (95.6% liked)

Privacy

40749 readers
834 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS