Tumblr post by nickyflowers from Jun 16, 2024:

it would be cool if websites let you be an adult on them. the advertisers and payment processors need everything to be Family Friendly though and their definitions of family and friendly are absolutely fucked. but since they're in charge of the Internet now, no one is allowed to be an adult. tiktokers say things like "unalive" and "seggs" because they know death and sex are too adult for online. online is for idiot babies only now because they're easier to market to.

oh im sorry you're a trans adult? super ban. you are super banned for life. you have upset Visa's feelings. Mastercard is throwing up in the corner. how could you do this to Google Ads?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 224 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I fucking hate algorithm speak so much

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 96 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    Someday soon an AI company will win a court case where they argue that their LLM is an expression of their free speech rights per Citizens United and is therefore legally allowed to say whatever it wants and in fact has the same rights to freedom of expression as the corporation itself does.

    This precedent will be the basis on which future AI rights are eventually won, not out of egalitarianism or altruism or respect for (possible) sentience, but because corporations want to avoid liability for the behavior of their products.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [+] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I think tools for detecting and filtering out ai material from search results would go a long way to improve the current situation, and is a middle ground between an internet revolution and a technological dystopia. There is still an unfathomably large amount of good information on the internet, the issue is that there is 20x more trash. And the trash is scaling rapidly, humans are not.

    If you haven't already, give the Marginalia search engine a try. They're doing something interesting in this space. You can filter out results with javascript, affiliate links, tracking, ads, and cookies. After filtering, the internet feels a lot more like it did 20 years ago, more sincere, more human.

    If I recall correctly, Marginalia is made and maintained by one guy. As the trash to good content ratio worsens, I think more people will want to build on and use projects like Marginalia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 119 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Honestly same with music services.

    I never want to hear an edited/censored song. I'm an adult, not someone listening to Kidz Bop

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 79 points 1 year ago (34 children)

    I wish Steam didn't have porn on it

    but I double-plus wish that Steam didn't stop hosting porn only because of payment companies with outsized control over creative expression

  • source
  • hideshow 34 child comments
  • [–] 80 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    You can hide those porn games in your preferences at least. Not the same, but at least you don't have to see them if you don't want to. It even distinguishes between games that have nudity/sex and those that are flat out porn.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Wait, for real? I only ever saw the 'sexual content' tag, which is annoying to block, as it covers stuff like Baulder's Gate 3 and such.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children)

    There should be a forced tutorial for that (and tags) when you first open the store lol

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I think several of them are not shown by default, and the user has to go grant permissions to see them. I don't remember where the line is drawn though (outright sex games, full nudity, mild, etc.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

    Y'know what? I'll disagree with you there, let the porn games be on Steam. BUT! Do a thorough quality and content check (i.e. no rape, kiddy diddling, spousal abuse, any other type of abuse, etc.) on ALL of them, and throw the slop away. Then do this for every other genre, and make the porn harder to find - like the video store backroom.

    Edit: Steam should assume more curation roles. I mean, even SOME curation roles, because the Steam library looks like my old dorm room the morning after my birthday party: filled with trash, vomit, and loneliness.

    Edit 2: speaking of video store backrooms, maybe they could do just that, branch off that section of the library and set it on its own domain, like a Steam After Dark, or whatever.

    Edit 3: STEAMY AFTER DARK! I want my 10.000 Internet Points NOW!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago* (3 children)

    Edit: Steam should assume more curation roles.

    Never going to happen. It's valve lmao.

    Also porn games will keep getting delisted and removed because ultimately it's the payment processors powering the store that have the final say. And nobody there is interested in indulging in your content checks, they have their own.

    Do a thorough quality and content check (i.e. no rape, kiddy diddling, spousal abuse, any other type of abuse, etc.) on ALL of them, and throw the slop away. Then do this for every other genre

    There are games that talk about or depict abuse as part of their story line. I think adults can be trusted to engage with art that has adult themes. In the end the hardest part (of letting adults in but not kids) is enforcement, games are rated for that reason but it's on parents to care.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It's thatbsimple rule: if you don't want it don't subscribe to it. Leave it for those who enjoy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (12 children)

    Tangential, but in my steam library, there is a single anime game, a free bullet hell that I pretty quickly realized was both too difficult and annoying for me. The main character’s voice was so piercingly shrill that I had to mute all voices to survive using a super move without experiencing an aneurysm.

    Now my recommendations are all hentai jigsaw puzzles, and I don’t even particularly like jigsaw puzzles or hentai. Steam doesn’t seem like the sort of company to abandon porn, if that was all it took to get them to advertise it to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    There's a setting in your store preferences to hide those games. It distinguishes between "there's sometimes nudity" and "porn game" even. 1000038244

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 55 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    There was a push... way back in the 90s, to implement a regulation on the internet in which "adult" material would register itself under the ".xxx" domain. And then you could do whatever horny shit you wanted under that heading, in the same way you could drop F-bombs and racial slurs on Satellite Radio or Cable TV. If someone didn't want their kids to watch certain material, they could very easily block the content by censoring everything from the ".xxx" domain. And ISPs could even offer "child-friendly" connections by automatically refusing to serve that content to opt-out customers.

    The plan died in committee, because conservative politicians considered it unfriendly to businesses.

    Similar pitches - broadcast frequencies that could be blocked with special chips in TVs, registries that businesses could add themselves to in order to let systems auto-filter there material, HTML metadata tags, FCC rules updates, state funded industry managed ratings agencies - all got the axe under a political class that insisted it was too hostile to the interests focused on making money.

    And so now we don't have any kind of tagging or sorting or filtering option native to content. It's all just a mass of generic data. Which is good if you want to engage in traffic quietly under the radar. But awful if you want to be an above board commercial enterprise with normal customers.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Those ideas don't really solve this problem though. Advertisers and payment processors would just not service these "adult content" sites. So all the popular sites wouldn't allow adult content.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Several adult friendly platforms have come and gone. Many of them very profitable and self sustaining. They all eventually get screwed by inability to process payments.

    And when people try to create their own payment methods not subject to arbitrary morality rules, the full weight of the existing banking system comes down hard and strangles them in the cradle.

    We could absolutely have safe, profitable, self sustaining adult friendly spaces, but the powers that be don't want that to exist and work hard to undermine that from every possible angle.

    It's really no different than all those efforts to ban local fiber ISP coops or how abortion clinics get shut down by arbitrary full hospital regulations because they couldn't ban them legally.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    It is worth noting that the .xxx domain does still exist.

    Its... a lot more like the late 90s / early 00s web.

    https://icannwiki.org/.xxx

    www.Search.xxx

    I... am uncertain as to whether or not payment processors ....care at all, or a lot about anything going on here...

    But uh yeah, people could just... start using this domain more and try to force a re-evaluation of internet/society norms.

    The internet is a lot less of a 'US sets all the rules' thing these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 40 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I miss the old days when the internet was a free-for-all. Anyone with minimal html skills could get a domain and basically make a site on whatever they wanted. Sure there was a lot of twisted stuff, but was also so much more fun.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Just dropping one of my favorites here...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    My question here is why hasn't anybody come up with a solution?

    It is a known problem that the current large payment processors do not want to work with adult themed companies.

    It is also known that regardless of that, there will always be adult themed companies and they will handle a lot of money.

    It is also known that processing payments for reliable companies that handle adult themes is a very profitable venture.

    So, why is it that there are no payment processors that will work with these companies?

    I thought we lived in a capitalistic society where the market would decide whether or not something was valuable.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    Its a Stop Killing Games kind of issue.

    Governments generally don't care, don't really understand it or take it seriously.

    So, no one ever ... attempts to regulate some new paradigm for payment processors.

    You'd need a mass social movement to petiton governments.

    Or maybe use I2P?

    ...

    Also lol at your last line.

    No, no living in a capitalist society means the richest capitalists are in charge, the free market isn't real, capitalists hate competiton, and love being as close to a monopoly as possible.

    They just say 'free market good' because it easily convinces those that have not studied economic history.

    If capitalism just, was a purely efficient societal structure, it would assign prohibitive costs to corruption, racism, sexism, sexual preference discrimination, etc, etc.

    ( the naive, pro free market interpretation, taken to its logical conclusion )

    Or, you could argue, it is pricing those things correctly, and that the general will of the people is infact racist and sexist.

    ( the ancap interpretation )

    Outcome is still the same, either way.

    The free market naturally corrupts itself, concentrates wealth, and money talks louder than poverty does... in a market based society.

    You have to have an effective societal counter balance to that at all times, otherwise, you just end up with oligarchy with extra steps.

    And the capitalists are of course motivated by their own capitalism logic to undermine and destroy that counter balance... so they uh, do that, all the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    There are payment processors that will work with these companies, they just charge more because of frequent chargebacks and legal risks. If a porn company found a way to solve these issues, they might not have such troubles, but that's obviously not really feasible

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I wonder how long after the purchase most of those porn related chargebacks happen. I suspect that, for video content, it wouldn't take more than a couple of hours, as the post-orgasmic regret kicks in hard.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Sometimes their spouse sees the bill, and they deny that they made the order so hard that they actually go through with making a chargeback for a purchase they know they made

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Yes. Porn has a lot of chargebacks. It is a "business of regretful purchases", lol.

    People think that purchases won't show up on their bill, but when it does, they lie about it, and try to get it reversed.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    those corporate m*therfuckers... making me censor myself...

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›