25
Not Every Co-Op Game is "Friendslop"
(www.endlessmode.com)
I've grown to resent the term "slop"
Not every game like this is friendslop, but the vast, vast majority are.
And, sure, some of these games are kind of sloppy—R.E.P.O. never managed to justify its existence for me,
That's sad. R.E.P.O. can feel sloppy but the devs are putting in the work: beta branch with new content, consistent weekly videos (about development and community questions) of higher than standard "slop budget" value.
But overall it's like Lethal Company as described: emergent storytelling is possible because it's sometimes scary and sometimes very funny.
R.E.P.O. is a much more polished experience than LC, so not sure what the author is on about. LC can be more funny, but R.E.P.O. is a better actual game IMO.
I think for a lot of larger publishers, they want the lock in and monetization that comes with stuff like battle passes or other such things that require an ongoing commitment.
But they also want the benefits of being “co-op” or other wise a cooperation focused multi player game. Namely that if you get one person in a friend group, you might drag in the rest of it as well. They also want the manipulative lock in, that if that is all your friends are playing, you’re kind of forced to play as well. Holding relationships hostage to maximize retention.
And that works to an extent, but it’s largely just wanting to have your cake and eat it to. If the game is commitment heavy, or heavily monetized, it’ll be much harder to get friends to start playing it let alone stick with it.
A game that has a low barrier to entry and does not insist upon commitment, will be much easier for a friend group to pick up. Big publishers salivate at the virality and broad adoption of these games, but also insist upon including the kinds of systems that work against it because including them is industry wisdom for how to “have a successful live service game that makes lots of money.”
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
25 points (96.3% liked)
Ghazi
899 readers
19 users here now
A community for progressive issues, social justice and LGBT+ causes in media, gaming, entertainment and tech.
Official replacement for Reddit's r/GamerGhazi
Content should be articles, video essays, podcasts about topics relevant to the forum. No memes, single images or tweets/toots/... please!
Community rules:
Be respectful and civil with each other. Don't be a jerk. There is a real human being on the other side of your screen. See also the Blahaj.Zone Community Rules
No bigotry of any kind allowed. Making racist, sexist, trans-/homo-/queerphobic, otherwise demeaning and hateful comments is not ok. Disabilities and mental illnesses are not to be used as insults and should not be part of your comment unless speaking of your own or absolutely relevant.
No gatekeeping and being rude to people who don't agree with you. Leave “gamer” stereotypes out of your comment (e.g. sexless, neck bearded, teenaged, basement-dwelling, etc). Don't compare people to animals, or otherwise deny their humanity. Even if you think someone is the worst human on the planet, do not wish death or harm upon them.
No "justice porn". Posts regarding legal action and similar is allowed, but celebrating someone being harmed is not.
Contrarianism for its own sake is unnecessary and not welcome.
No planning operations, no brigading, no doxxing or similar activities allowed.
Absolutely no defense of GamerGate and other right-wing harassment campaigns, no TERFs and transphobia, racism, dismissing of war crimes and praise of fascists. This includes “JAQing off”, intentionally asking leading questions while pretending to be a neutral party. This also applies to other forms of authoritarianism and authoritarian or criminal actions by liberal or leftist governments.
NSFW threads, such as ones discussing erotic art, pornography and sex work, must be tagged as such.
Moderators can take action even if none of the rules above are broken.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS