977
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

But no, let's cut them down to build one more lane, right?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 108 points 5 days ago

Somebody reported this post for being off-topic, but it's not.

[-] [email protected] 33 points 5 days ago

yeah I mean the car is the parked car is what had the highest temperature.

[-] [email protected] 24 points 5 days ago
[-] [email protected] 17 points 5 days ago

I have a Honda civic, which was sold to me with defective air conditioning, which was never covered by the warranty because fuck Honda. My phone literally overheats and stops working. I’ve almost had heat stroke multiple times just trying to get to fucking work.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

It's kind of hilarious how awful your life is; thanks for sharing, offer of hugs.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

What happens when you drive with all windows down?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

The rationale being that we would have more trees if we didn't have so many roads?

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Not even roads, parking lots man, tons and tons of empty unused space

[-] [email protected] 6 points 4 days ago

Not fewer roads (It's still important to have good street grid connectivity and small block sizes), but narrower roads and smaller parking lots.

[-] [email protected] 83 points 6 days ago

Never mind shade, anyone who's ever ridden a bicycle from the country into an urban area will instantly feel the rise in air temperature. It's almost unbelievable, like you've stepped into a different planet.

But it's okay because cars have air conditioning. /s 😒

[-] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago

100% agree. Biking in nature feels so much fresher than in the city.

Cities are a hot oven.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I haven’t, but is it more than the diffference between fields and forests? Though forests aren’t just shade, the trees/plants also cool themselves and their surroundings.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

It can be more. It can really be like hitting a wall in some cities, suddenly you're on the shitside, the change is very sudden and very dramatic, lot more than from a field to a forest.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 72 points 6 days ago

Along the same lines are all the parks in my city that cut down large trees to plant small ornamental trees. Oh, want a bench? Nowhere near the trees. Yeah, I'm talking about you, Shoreline park! WTheck

[-] [email protected] 52 points 6 days ago

Please enjoy this one person bench with anti-homeless armrests on it so you can not sit next to your wife comfortably

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 64 points 6 days ago

This shows why replacing inner city roads with tree lined avenues makes a difference in city climate.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 6 days ago

just one more lane bro, please 😩 it will fix the traffic for sure

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

We YEARN for the lanes.

[-] [email protected] 32 points 6 days ago

I had to cut a major shade tree in my backyard, it was ready to fall over. We replaced it with a sapling and I cannot wait for it to grow up, holy shit my deck gets fucking hot! There's a couple more that gotta go soon too and I'm very reluctant - expensive to cut down, expensive to replace, especially if they are already tall.

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Plant and groom the new ones early.

The trick with plants is generally to act like the creepiest villian asshole you can. If you dont emotionally abuse your plants, they're not gonna be any good.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 5 days ago

You want me to be creepy with my plants? Just how creepy are we talking here?

[-] [email protected] 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Abuse them. Cut them to be more to your liking, starve them of water to get their roots where you want, groom them like you're Jeffrey Epstein, emotionally abuse them, occasionally waterboard them, torture them with loud music at all times...

And they will thrive. Its why agricultural societies jumped into depravity faster than their hunter gatherer peers; plants just need abuse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Plant something that grows faster? That won’t last as long, but it should give some shade in the meantime.

+ evaporative cooling

Edit1: Bonus points for something that would natively grow there, because you have to do less to support them once they’ve grown a bit.

Edit2: You could decide to not fully get rid of them and instead slowly kill them. Like leaving the trunk and some big branches, cutting the rest off. Cutting off everything green that grows anew. That will still give a little bit of shade. But can also support other plants to give them hold and protect them from wind. Ivy probably can cover it with green. I don’t really know what I’m talking about.

Edit3: Replace ivy with other native climbing plants if it’s not native in your area etc. (It’s native where I live, but it wouldn’t be native to the Americas for example)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

The sapling is native and will get huge, but its gonna be a few years. Admittedly I got it for free, anything already bigger is quite an expense. Ivy was actually a huge problem, I spent a ton of time and effort cutting it off the trees because it was choking them out and killing them. The trees I still need to get rid of are not native. I was told they will continue to grow until they are too tall to support themselves and fall over. The longer I wait the more expensive it is to cut them down. My best guess is they are 25-30 feet tall already. Shopping for trees even half that size is something I was not prepared for, but I am hoping to figure out soon knowing it needs to happen eventually.

I spent most my life in the city, so when I bought the property I wanted the mature trees, but was unaware of the problems these particular trees had. I still like this spot but I wish I knew more about what I was getting into. I'm using a pop up tent for cover while I figure out what exactly to do, but the shade it provides is nowhere near as cool as being under the trees.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

does that particular tree make money for some billionaire? if not it is exp~~a~~endable

[-] [email protected] 18 points 5 days ago

When trees are on the verge of extinction, they’ll grow exactly one tree, lock it behind security, and charge us money to see it.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

And say: "seeeee? Capitalism actually naturally breeds conservationism. Without the monetary incentive all trees would have naturally (and through no fault of our own) died out. This is why socialism doesn't work.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I think they will probably make that a billionaire access only resource "fresh oxygen from a real tree"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

if not it is expandable

If only. But I know that was a typo

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 41 points 6 days ago

Please also remember how hot that pavement can be for a doggos feet.

[-] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago

"We're gonna pave over the grassy public/dog park for a parking lot, but you can still walk your dogs! Just buy these doggy shoes for when it gets really hot. Problem solved!"

[-] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago

Capitalism is ingenious in creating problems that it sells the solutions for.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

It appears to have been done with a small temperature measuring device.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 16 points 6 days ago

Wait, are theses actual measurements? Or made-up numbers?

[-] [email protected] 29 points 6 days ago

Concrete surface in contact with direct noon sunlight is always gonna be scorching hot, 50°C is not far fetched. On a super hot day you can cook an egg on concrete. These surface also tend to heat up slow but also lose heat slowly, which is why even after a couple of hour after sun down it will still feel warm to the touch, creating what is known as urban heat trap.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

Dr. Hannah Fry made a short video about this recently -- this kind of heat retention is why London Underground stations are so bloody hot, because the clay tiles lining the underground tunnels have absorbed heat from trains braking day in and day out and are constantly releasing excess heat into the air at the stations

[-] [email protected] 10 points 6 days ago

Interesting. So adding regenerative breaking to the trains would actually reduce the heat.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

The photo seems to suggest he is measuring surface temperatures, so I assume they are real. Doesn't seem that far fetched.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago

Concrete and dark-colored metal surfaces can absolutely reach those temperatures after a few hours of direct sunlight

[-] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago

In really hot and sunny weather, you can absolutely get serious burns from concrete heating up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 14 points 6 days ago

Really more than trees, it seems to be an argument for more grass to help reduce temps especially where trees aren't feasible or will take time to grow

[-] [email protected] 25 points 6 days ago

It's primarily an argument to not cut down trees that are already there just so you can build another fucking parking lot or something

[-] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Here they cut them down to make bike lanes.

And before you demand to just take space away from the cars: this is a fast bike lane through a park. The next car is half a kilometer away.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

...that is genuinely bad planning, why would they not route the lane through somewhere there aren't trees, like, say next to the trees?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago

Im surprised the blacktop and what looks like dark gravel was less than the relatively lighter brick.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago

Spoken by someone who's never been to a place that doesn't naturally have trees.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
977 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

12537 readers
1652 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS