I mean, even this kind of argument doesn't really work in reality. We already live in "hell on earth", and via electorialism usually two choices are given: the progressive "nothing ever happens" option (so your socdems, democrats, you'll be lucky to get a good policy or two but no real change to the status quo) or "literally hitler" option, maybe some parties that stand in the middle of the spectrum if the country is "advanced" enough.

In other words, via electorialism you can either preserve the hell on earth or make it worse, and the process of voting legitimizes this status quo as it's what "people have decided" rather than who the ruling class cast as candidates, who had the most money and media influence for campaigning.

It's important to see electorialism for what it truly is.

Voting is a very small part of what the average person can do to use their political power.

Oh dear, the shitlibs are still using the 'lesser evil' argument!

Neoliberalism is all about creating hell on earth

The "Hell on Earth" is just yet more capitalist/empire propaganda to scare you into thinking exactly this so you keep voting for the uniparty

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=False_dichotomy