all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 30 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Bullshit. Yeah, Trump is surrounded by some very loud and obnoxious dumbasses, but I call bullshit on this one. A sortie of three B2s loaded with bunker busters flies halfway across the world with a full entourage of support hardware just to shoot blindly in the general direction of a uranium processing facility, based on guesswork?

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 45 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I could be wrong, but I think the article is saying there is "no intel" on Iran building nukes, and that nothing has changed - not that there was no intel and they guessed at what they were shooting at.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    I mean, when the WMD pretext is an entirely fabricated justification anyway you don't really need more Intel on it to carry out the attack.

    Given Irans willingness to cooperate before, it's not like the lack of Intel was about where these facilities are or anything like that.

    (Though Iranian reports are stating that they did in fact move the uranium to actual undisclosed facilities before the attack)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 24 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    these motherfuckers are going to get us all killed

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] [S] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    it's like watching a monkey with a hand grenade

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    It's like watching a horse. Loose in a hospital!

    Whoever posted that the other day might have broken me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    Literal Iraq/Afghanistan repeat. God must be using chatgpt, this writing is getting lazy.

  • source