291
submitted 2 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,” declare G7 leaders in a joint statement.

The leaders of the G7 countries on Monday issued a joint statement saying Iran should not have nuclear weapons and affirming Israel's right to defend itself.

"Iran is the principal source of regional instability and terror. We have been consistently clear that Iran can never have a nuclear weapon," declared the statement, issued by the leaders of the U.S., U.K., France, Germany, Italy, Canada and Japan, along with the EU.

They pledged to "remain vigilant to the implications for international energy markets and stand ready to coordinate, including with like-minded partners, to safeguard market stability."

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

Even the statement is not about protecting people lives but about market stability.

They are not working for the people...

[-] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago

"Tehran “is the principal source of regional instability and terror,”

I guess we all just have to pretend Israel doesn't exist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Isreal has bombed Iran

everyone likes this

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Religious zealots can't be allowed to have nukes. You have to at least masquerade as a well-adjusted nation while you develop the nukes and slowly massage your zealots into positions of power over a few decades. Those are the rules.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

The country founded on the idea that "God promised us this land" already has nukes.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] [email protected] 170 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Israel is the principal source of regional instability and terror and everyone and his dog knows this.

The kowtowing to Trump and his Zionist sponsors by the client states of the US Empire is an insult to objective reality.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Seriously. We’re supposed to regard Iran as an existential threat that is worth any price to neutralize. Okay, boomers.

load more comments (34 replies)
[-] [email protected] 50 points 2 days ago

“We will do anything to maintain the status quo, up to and including genocidal ethnosupremacy”!

I am honestly so revolted.

load more comments (21 replies)
[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Probably best for all of us if nobody can ever have nuclear weapons, but what do i know..

[-] [email protected] 103 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I believe ALL of the following;

  • Iran should not have nuclear weapons
  • Israel should not have nuclear weapons
  • Iran should not weaponize Palestinian suffering or coax them into attacking Israel while Iran itself sees little repercussions
  • Israel should not genocide
  • Israel has committed genocide and should pay a hefty price
  • Neither Iran nor Israel will really answer for their fuckery
  • Palestinians will remain fucked...if they survive.

My heart breaks for the Palestinian people who suffer and die for others' greed, ambition, and political squabbles.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Iran: "We're good then, we don't just have one."

[-] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago

Ukraine had nukes and gave them up. They were invaded.

Iraq gave up their WMD program after the first Gulf War. They were invaded again.

Iran definitely had a nuclear program, but doesn't appear to be pursuing it anymore. They're getting attacked and quite possibly will get invaded.

South Africa had a nuclear program and gave it up. Left alone.

The Great Powers, particularly the United States but also Russia, have shown that your country should just keep going once you start. Chances are, you'll get invaded, anyway.

This is not the way towards anti-proliferation.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago

Sweden stopped its nuclear program.

But joined NATO which (in theory) is like having nukes.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Hell, even if you don't. Gaddafi made a big show of "giving up" weapons that he didn't even really have, and he still got raped to death with a bayonet.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago

"Iran is two weeks away from nuclear capability" - Netanyahu: 2012, 2015, 2018, 2023, 2025

[-] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

He started a lot earlier than 2012

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

How else can the most advanced first-world nations keep exploiting the Middleeast?

With Netynyahu, we can change the government of any nation in the middleast. We just tell him to make a presentation that they're bad and have big weapons!

Guys please understand we, the US, UK, Germany, and rest of G7 first-world nations, reaally need to assassinate forign leaders and destory and kill the people of any nation that opposes the existance of a genocidal ethnostate aparthied .... because, the few Zionists who pay our salaries will not have a country where they can kill, evict, colonize, assassinate anyone who is not from their chosen race. Then we will have to give these brown people democracy, and their own governments?!!

If we did not make the middleast into dictatorships that work with our genocidal ethostate only, then they will not sell us cheap oil and will not have to couple all their trades, currencies and inflations against US dollar. Omg. imagine if they were then allowed to manufacture their own weapons and not buy trillions worth of military equipments and defense contracts from us? omg.. our 9999 military bases there? who will pay for them?

[-] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago

But genocide against Palestinians is a-OK.

What does the "G" in G7 stand for? Gaslighting? Genocide? Grift? Maybe there are 7 Gs.

[-] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago

China, India, and Pakistan once again proving that having nukes does actually matter because you can't be arbitrarily shoved around around by the only other nuclear powers.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2025
291 points (98.0% liked)

World News

47627 readers
2301 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS