275
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago

Please remember this when you (generic "you" here) read the words "non-lethal".

"Non-lethal" is marketing to make it not sound as horrible as it is.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Non-lethal?

Less-lethal?

...

'Potentially Lethal', restructures the phrasing to be less disarming and reassuring, to being more worrisome and concerning.

'Maiming Munitions' has some alliteration to it.

Both of those phrases are just as if not more factually accurate.

This is how you play the language manipulation game.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I kind of like the alliteration actually, but I also think most people in the US (this is a sad statement in education) wouldn't understand it. Potentially lethal is probably better.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I was a copy editor at a small newspaper for about a year.

This shit isn't hard.

Its a willful choice for journos to go along with copaganda phrasing... or, well, now that they have done it willingly for so long that a fascist is in charge... well now maybe you could call the use of copaganda due to the chilling effect.

Great job 90% of journalism majors from two decades ago, you failed us all.

[-] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago

A good time to remind everybody that while rubber bullets are considered "non-lethal," they can kill.

Back in 2004 a college student in Boston died from a bullet that missed its intended target, hit the ground and ricocheted into her eye.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Killing_of_Victoria_Snelgrove

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Let me make a correction: bullets, they're bullets. You never point a gun at something or someone that you don't intend on destroying. Guns are tools. They have a purpose. If you're running after a turkey with a hand saw you've lost your fucking mind. If you are shooting people exercising the same rights you have then it's about the same. For fuck sake, they had to change the definition from "non-lethal" to "less than lethal" to avoid murder charges. Of which, there were many.

[-] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago

So much for freedom of speech.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2025
275 points (99.6% liked)

United Kingdom

4929 readers
190 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in [email protected] or [email protected]
More serious politics should go in [email protected].

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS