"An editor has nominated this article for deletion."
Haha
"An editor has nominated this article for deletion."
Haha
God, that has got to be one of the lamest deletion discussions in history. "It's not relevant because its just a passing term that everyone will forget about in a month" ffs.
Because it is a passing term.
I'm gonna just point you to the huge list of rebuttals in the deletion discussion that do a much better job than I could at elaborating on why this take is just completely wrong (and irrelevant).
All of that would be great if it wasn't a totally passing term that is going to go away, and nobody will be searching for in a month.
Yaknow, the same how there isn't a "sleepy Joe" article either.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleepy_Joe_(nickname)
Yeah so about that.
There is a let's go Brandon article, however
Also, there's totally an article for sleepy joe.
An editor has nominated this article for deletion.
Who knew Trump was editing Wikipedia on his off-time?!
Just a killjoy. They are an accomplished wikipedian, but sometimes as they become more senior, it gets to their head. Most people are voting to keep it
A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.
Rules:
Recommended: