submitted 2 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've corrected the number of drives in this version. I was unknowingly counting non-drives (e.g a site number change without moving) . I've now added the Traverse JSON as an additional data source. This provides some additional data, such as drive times and the Traverse JSON data also makes it simpler to count the actual numbers of drives.

Credits: NASA/JPL-Caltech

all 4 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Just a suggestion, but maybe stick to metric? Having a table format like this where multiple columns are showing the same thing in a mix of units, hurts my head.

At least make that 4th row 2nd column not have KM in the column that's otherwise all ft / miles. We don't need to know 10970.06 m vs 10.97km

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

I've needed the excuse to simplify some of the data. Working on it :)

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

multiple columns are showing the same thing in a mix of units, hurts my head.

https://lemmy.world/u/Shadow

This should be easier to digest

this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025

20 points (100.0% liked)

NASA's Perseverance Mars Rover

1797 readers

29 users here now

On the plains of Jezero, the secrets of Mars' past await us! Follow for the latest news, updates, pretty pics, and community discussion on NASA and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory's most ambitious mission to Mars!

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]