174
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 20 points 6 days ago

Close. Put the capitalist train on its side, spilling hazardous waste into a community water source.

[-] [email protected] 177 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Calling China communist is a stretch. More like planned authoritarian capitalism tempered with socialism. China has 607 billionaires, communism would have 0.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The term state capitalism cover a lot of the basics of the Chinese system.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Thank you. Was looking for a better term.

[-] [email protected] 75 points 1 week ago

Also, Japan is very capitalistic and they have amazing trains.

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

look I don't care who's communist and who's capitalist, we need them trains

[-] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

It's not a stretch, it's outright false to call it communism or socialism, systems which necessitate the abolishment of capitalist mode of production (commodity production, private ownership, markets) and money. China, meanwhile, literally has billionaires, still produces things under capitalist mode of production and the only oddity it has compared to other Capitalist countries is partially nationalized economy (which Mussolini has also done, it's not socialism by itself).

It's just a social democracy.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Isn’t there only one political party in China? How is that democracy? Not being hostile, genuinely curious how that would work

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

You can have disagreements within a single party. Like how in the US they banned communist parties because it didn't align with the capitalist ideals that all American parties are required to align with.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

The US has not banned communist parties from existing. There's even a few local elected communist mayors. The Red Scare for sure did it's job though, and declaring as a communist in virtually any US office is a surefire way to lose.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago
[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Which was ruled unconstitutional in 1973 by the federal district court of Arizona. Did you finish the article that you linked?

Blawis v. Bolin

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

It's like burning down a house and asking what's the problem after the fire has gone out. Repercussions last a long time. The cultural changes produced go on for generations.

Anyways, none of that matters cause this is America. We just did the unconstitutional thing at the State level instead.

https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/GV/htm/GV.557.htm

Please read and hit me with some more complaints. Maybe if I keep knocking them down you will eventually change your mind :)

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Yes the cultural repercussions of the Red Scare are pervasive to this day. I mentioned that in my original reply.

The Texas State code you linked has a pretty funny definitions of "Communist":

Sec. 557.021. DEFINITIONS. In this subchapter:

(1) "Communist" means a person who commits an act reasonably calculated to further the overthrow of the government:

(A) by force or violence; or

(B) by unlawful or unconstitutional means and replace it with a communist government.

It's not altogether uncommon in southern states to redefine words to make the name of the act sound extremely right wing. If this was written a decade later I guarantee it would say "Terrorist" instead. This particular act is also silly because it just redefines treason laws that already existed to make it seem like they were stopping communists. States did similar in this past election with "banning illegal immigrants from voting" on ballots. It's a political scare tactic and it clearly is working on you. Again, this law doesn't actually ban colloquial definition of "Communist" just some weird legal rewrite of what would most people would call a terrorist.

It also is kind of shitty to have someone come at you with "Brutal" and linking to an article that debunks their claim. Then continues to move the goalpost and condescendingly tells you that they're going to "knock down" anything you rebut with while also calling them "complaints" instead of facts. As such, I think I'm done with this conversation. Have a nice day!

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

Before I too let the conversation die I just want to point out how much you devalue "political scare tactics" like they have no effect and can be basically ignored by its targets with no repercussions. I want you to think on that for a while. Figure out yourself why that is a self evidently silly thing to say when discussing how they redefined communist to mean traitor and how that means they actually didn't ban communism.

I bet your a real big fan of the children's game "I'm not touching you"

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

If you insist on continuing to engage me then let's pivot to a different conversation.

Why are you so hostile towards me and why do you insist on ascribing things to me that I didn't say, or even imply? In fact, I've said the opposite of what you have claimed I said in your comment... The main reason I had for pointing out that communism is not banned is that it actively dissuades people from joining a communist party if people believe it's illegal. Which is the intent of the scare tactic. Which I believe is a bad outcome. Do you follow the logic here? Now can we please put that aside as I actually think we're effectively on the same page or at least on the same chapter.

I've tried to be moderately polite to you but you seem adamant to be a complete ghoul back to me. I just can't figure out why a simple rebuttal sent you flying off into a weird attack mode where you seem to ignore facts put back to you. What I can't stress enough though, is that mindset is not unique to you. It's extremely off putting to me personally, and I'd very much like to figure out where the heck this mindset is coming from.

I will say that I don't care for more insults. I really don't have the mental energy to deal with some random person attacking me for no real reason. So if you do reply please keep it cordial or I think I will completely disengage from further discussions with you.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

I don't insist on continuing. I'm sticking to my word and leaving it there.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Wikipedia lists 9 parties in the NPC

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

You should also learn that those parties are subsidiaries of CCP, the governing party. They are not actual alternatives.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

And all of those parties are listed as being under the control of CCP. So it is a one party state.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

I think people have some degree of chouce at the more local levels, but you're right.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] [email protected] 93 points 1 week ago

China is as communist as I am a french male model. That said, it is indeed a mistake to allow the "free market" to determine the nation's critical infrastructure. American rail is an absolute joke.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

muricans calling everything communism that isn't gop cock sucking is getting old

[-] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Whos trains are those ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ the world may never know

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Are they belong to a stateless moneyless society? It would be very embarrassing for you if they aren't.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Would it be? True it's not communist but also China doesn't claim to be. They claim it as an aspiration not as a current state of affairs. However we are random internet people. Are we really going to explain to every dumbass how China isn't communist, only a vanguard state hoping to evolve into one in the future according to the chain of events described in the communist manifesto?

No. Cause that's a waste of time. Being angry that all that context wasn't added is pedantic because we ain't operating with strict definitions that everyone agrees to. We are working with cultural vibe checks. And as far as culture is concerned, China is communist.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 6 days ago

They are run by Communists over a Socialist society, working to reach Communism. They have not reached Communism, nobody has, but they have an overwhelmingly publicly owned and planned economy they are advancing year over year.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

Did you have a stroke writing that? It makes zero sense

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

yeah we almost got a high speed rail system but some dipshit from south africa decided to build a shitty tunnel instead

[-] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Communism is when trains run on time

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

’Communism is when communal efforts produce results.’

Accidentally correct, you dolt.

[-] [email protected] -2 points 6 days ago

Well, America is so communist then, it's not even close. None of their results were the result of any individual, it's always a communal effort.
The only non-communism is a small personal garden, as long as there are more than two people working on something, it's communism because community.
Either that, or the word communism means something very different, you dolt

[-] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Yes. All of our successes are the result of communal effort. It’s not communism because the means of production are controlled by a small group of people, who also absorb all of the excess wealth created from the communal efforts.

Reply back please. Your self-owns are cracking me up.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

Daamn, you're so close to the point I was making, you can almost taste it. Now you need to actually engage with it in good faith, for real. I don't expect you do though.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2025
174 points (70.5% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1852 readers
4 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS