That would be a planet-eating star, OR a star eating a planet.
Shouldn't journalists be able to construct sentences?
Yeah, seriously. I was expecting some kinda weird interaction that was causing the star to eject fuel in a constant stream. The title is backwards though, and no where near as noteworthy.
Yeah foreal, I was severely disappointed. I wouldn't say my day is ruined but fucking hell I did my best for a solid while to try and understand it, and it turns out to just be a wrong title.
So science journalism continues to suck
~~science~~ journalism continues to suck.
FTFY
Scientists discover 95% of space related article are gibberish clickbait.
Personally I'd prefer less click bait, not more.
A community to discuss space & astronomy through a STEM lens
Also keep in mind, mander.xyz's rules on politics
Please keep politics to a minimum. When science is the focus, intersection with politics may be tolerated as long as the discussion is constructive and science remains the focus. As a general rule, political content posted directly to the instance’s local communities is discouraged and may be removed. You can of course engage in political discussions in non-local communities.
🔭 Science
🚀 Engineering
🌌 Art and Photography