It was an age-detection regex bug (oney in money, if you're curious - and I guess fishnet or something triggered nsfw). Should be fixed now - thank you. As mentioned to others in my DMs, fixing the filtering is very high on my todo list. The new model seems to be able to reliably produce images which bypass the old filtering system. I'll hopefully start on it today or tomorrow, but it will likely take several days to complete, and may require iterative tweaking over the next few weeks/months to reduce false positives/negatives.

To be very clear: Political stuff has always been and will always be allowed on perchance. If you notice any other issues like this, please report and I'll fix. But hopefully the filtering system overhaul will fix a lot of the current issues, and require less hacky/bug-prone stuff like regex-based detection. Current system is a pretty messy "defense-in-depth" type approach.

It's curious. Some people work, like Taylor Swift, and others don't, like Natalie Portman. Is it a matter of training the database? Do we just have to keep training it? Or will we always miss certain personalities?

wow fascinating. i doubted this so i tried it myself and indeed it's true. Here's the image in to my gallery. and refresh and it's gone.

no idea what to think yet but interesting; did not expect

@[email protected] feel free to stay unreachable but, if not, this is an unusual censorship that could benefit from an explanation.

is it prevention of defamation? political pictures? fear of trump crackdowning perchance if too much critical media is known to come from it?

Oh yeah that happens a lot.

This feels like a bad omen, if you're from USA