369
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] bradinutah 47 points 6 days ago
[-] [email protected] 15 points 6 days ago

I cried so hard I laughed

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I cried, then a Trump supporter laughed at me before getting whipped by Elon Musk for laughing on the job

[-] [email protected] 26 points 5 days ago
[-] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

Guest 8647 wants to get off Mr. Trump's Wild Ride

[-] [email protected] 19 points 6 days ago

History of the world, tbh. First it was hundredaires, then thousandaires, then millionaires, now billionaires. Eventually it will be trillionaires, and so on.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 5 days ago

I mean, you're not wrong, but it's worth remembering that the scale of the difference has never been so radical. The wealth gap is wider than it has ever been.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

Is it, though? Is it wider than a king's wealth versus a serf's? The scale is different I agree, but is the proportion, really?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Is it, though?

It is. A king could have 5,000 serfs and hey that's a lot of serfs. But it's nothing compared to tens of billions of dollars in an economy where most people make 35K a year. And serfs were not hot-swappable cogs like workers effectively are today. Losing a serf was a non-fungible, tangible loss.

It's apples to oranges comparing medieval feudalism to modern global capitalism, I think it's folly trying to say one is "better", but the scale of the latter certainly dwarfs the former into barely perceiveable insignificance.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

Elon Musk's net worth is about the lifetime earnings of 280,000 people.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

I wasn't trying to argue either of them being "better". I just presented kings vs serfs as an example of obvious wealth disparity in history, but I could have equally said roman emperor and roman slave, of which the difference in wealth would be, well, infinite really.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 5 days ago

I know you weren't, but if I didn't put that disclaimer there someone would will themselves into thinking I was because this is the internet.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Well, no, feudalism was actually fundamentally different. Power didn't come from money, it came from land and alliances and shit.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago
this post was submitted on 24 May 2025
369 points (98.2% liked)

Futurama

13539 readers
1 users here now

For all things Futurama

Rule 1: Don't be a jerkwad!

Rule 2: Alternate video links to be linked in a comment, below the original video.

Related Communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS