this post was submitted on 21 May 2025
979 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

70268 readers
3967 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 151 points 2 days ago (41 children)

NGL, it’s really f*cking depressing when you give students 30m to create something of their own imagination, and they do it in the first minute with chatGPT and spend the other 29m playing games the phone and asking to “go to the bathroom” whenever they notice someone in the hallway.

The excuses you hear when you do something so oppressive as to request they keep their phones in their own backpacks for the duration of the task.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 days ago (18 children)

I regularly advocate for banning phones from schools but people here in Lemmy (same on Reddit years ago) completely lose their shit with that idea, start talking how that'll leave them defenseless in an emergency, how it is torture, how they absolutely can't live without them

Not thirty years ago nobody had cellphones in school, they barely existed, and everything was fine, everyone was fine without and with cellphones I see so much shit going on. Yes, it's the Future, kids need cellphones, but they also need to learn to be without cellphone, and they need to learn responsible use.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Dunno Yeah I disagree with AI. I grew up without phones but they should not be used in schools.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ngl. I bought a signal jammer for my wife to use in her classroom (after all, it said “for educational purposes only”) and the kids could never figure out why the signal sucked so bad in her classroom during class times. She never got caught using it and never had to worry about them being on their phones.

If there was an emergency, people would just call the front office and they could always reach her on the land line in the classroom.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago

(after all, it said “for educational purposes only”)

The FCC hates this one simple trick

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Violating federal laws is awesome, everyone should do it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

If it’s good enough for the President! /s

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Removed by mod" haha

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (16 children)

I was uninterested in school because nothing was ever done to make me interested, even at home.

Later in life I was diagnosed with ADHD and now I’m a software developer. Sadly school isn’t for everybody and I just thought I was stupid and lazy, it turns out I was fine I just needed the right help.

Edit: Votes don’t matter but I’d love to know the reasoning for the 5 downvotes on this. Like why don’t you put across your opposition.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What's breathtaking is how clueless education system administrators are failing at their jobs. They've been screwing up the system for a very long time, and now they have a whole new set of shiny objects to spend your money on.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In my former school district they paid a ton to some consultancy firm to "use AI to optimize the bus route". The first day of testing the new route many kids didn't get home until after 9pm. They cancelled school for the rest of the week and then immediately reverted to the old route.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago (26 children)

That's going to be great fun when the AI bubble pops and the subscription prices go up exponentially.

On the other hand, there have been other opinions about education that say it should be about making or researching something. Give a student a goal and let them figure it out using chatbots or whatever.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] [email protected] 107 points 2 days ago (10 children)

TBH, I'd AI can screw up the education system so fast then it is the fault in the education system. AI is bad, but our education system is not good either.

[–] [email protected] 97 points 2 days ago (12 children)

but our education system is not good either.

No Child Left Behind has fucked us for over 20 years...

People are blaming these college kids, but their entire k-12 was under No Child, they were never taught critical thinking, what the fuck are they supposed to do? No one ever taught these kids to think for themselves.

We failed an entire generation, and it's too late to fix it for them now, the best we can do is fix it for the kids that will start public education in a few years.

But we'll be paying the price for decades

[–] [email protected] 85 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Like all things republican, you ruin the public service, then tell everybody we need to get rid of this public service cause only the free market can provide that service in good quality.

Vouchers will save us our children!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This 100%.

The education system was not OK, and has not been for a while. Its main goal is limiting liability, not educating kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Unfortunately, I think many kids could easily approach AI the same way older generations thought of math, calculators, and the infamous “you won’t have a calculator with you everywhere.” If I was a kid today and I knew I didn’t have to know everything because I could just look it up, instantly; I too would become quite lazy. Even if the AI now can’t do it, they are smart enough to know AI in 10 years will. I’m not saying this is right, but I see how many kids would end up there.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

know AI in 10 years will.

That kind of the main problem: there is no indication that it will. I know one thing: current way LLM works, the chances that the problem of "lying" and "hallucinations", will even be solved are slim to none. There could be some mechanism that works in tandem with the bullshit generator machine to keep it in check, but it doesn't exist yet.
So most likely either we will collectively learn this fact and stop relying on this bullshit, which means there is a generation of kids who essentially skipped a learning phase, or we don't learn this fact, and there will be a society of mindless zombies that are fed lies and random bullshit on a second-to-second basis.
Both cases are bleak, but the second one is nightmarish.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

but we already have Fox News

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This could be complete bullshit because im not an expert but i sometimes think that we could have a future where without testing and nurturing peoples critical thinking skills we end up with people who dont know how to create a rational argument or assess information they are given for its accuracy and authenticity, or to know when they are being deceived by malicious actors.

English writing assignments as simple as a book report require you to take different views and angles on something to understand it better and the nuances of the whole, but tell a LLM to write it for you and you are not developing that part of your own mind where you may learn to do things like see the whole story above the individual events noise, see things from others perspective/feelings and understand alternate world views. These are critical for having empathy for others and understanding the world around you.
And that is just one small example i came up with.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

We are already there. Just look at the state of society right now and observe the critical thinking and media literacy skills of the average person.

In the words of cyberpunk author Wiilam Gibson: “The future is already here – it’s just not very evenly distributed.“

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Going to have generations of people unable to think analytically or creatively, and just as bad, entering fields that require a real detailed knowledge of the subject and they don't. Going to see a lot of fuck ups in engineering, medicine, etc because of people faking it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 70 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I teach at a community college. I see a lot of AI nonsense in my assignments.

So much so that I’m considering blue book exams for the fall.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

For anyone who is also not from the US:

A blue book exam is a type of test administered at many post-secondary schools in the United States. Blue book exams typically include one or more essays or short-answer questions. Sometimes the instructor will provide students with a list of possible essay topics prior to the test itself and will then choose one or let the student choose from two or more topics that appear on the test.

EDIT, as an extra to solve the mystery:

Butler University in Indianapolis was the first to introduce exam blue books, which first appeared in the late 1920s.[1] They were given a blue color because Butler's school colors are blue and white; therefore they were named "blue books".

[–] [email protected] 60 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Importantly it is hand written, no computers.

Biggest issue is that kids’ handwriting often sucks. That’s not a new problem but it’s a problem with handwritten work.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

lol , piret getting robbed kind of situation we are in

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (6 children)

We’ve been needing to rework education for years now anyway. At least this will force the teachers to change & adapt, whether they like it or not.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

What teachers?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Honest question: how do we measure critical thinking and creativity in students?

If we're going to claim that education is being destroyed (and show we're better than our great^n grandparents complaining about the printing press), I think we should try to have actual data instead of these think-pieces and anecdata from teachers. Every other technology that the kids were using had think-pieces and anecdata.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 days ago (37 children)

I'm thinking the only way people will be able to do schoolwork without cheating now is going to be to make them sit in a monitored room and finish it there.

load more comments (37 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›