this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
293 points (94.3% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3809 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) says she’s scrapping any more romantic outings after getting booted out of a “Beetlejuice” performance, exclaiming, “All future date nights have been canceled.”

The Colorado Republican, along with a male companion, was escorted out of a Denver theater last week for vaping, singing and “causing a disturbance” during a performance of “Beetlejuice.” The incident was first reported by The Denver Post.

A Boebert spokesperson initially denied that the lawmaker had been vaping, before video surfaced showing her doing so at the theater.

“It’s always hard whenever there’s gravity put on the voters. I’m here to provide levity, and lift burdens off of people,” Boebert said in an interview with TMZ on Monday. “So anytime that they’re carrying mine, it’s something that you kind of feel deep inside.”

“But ultimately, all future date nights have been canceled. And I learned to check party affiliations before you go on a date,” Boebert — who filed for divorce from her husband in May — quipped, an apparent reference to reports that her date at the “Beetlejuice” performance is a Democrat.

Asked if her dating life with the man was “over,” the 36-year-old congresswoman replied, “We’ve peacefully parted at this time. Great man, great friend. And I wish him all the best.”

“All in all, it was mostly a lovely time and I’ve taken responsibility for my actions,” Boebert said of the controversial incident, which her Democratic challenger, Adam Frisch, slammed as “another notch in the belt of embarrassment.”

“There’s a lot of folks who are certainly understanding, and they understand it was part of my personal life, my private time,” Boebert said. “Something I really indulge in.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 123 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Colorado Republican, along with a male companion, was escorted out of a Denver theater last week for vaping, singing and “causing a disturbance” during a performance of “Beetlejuice.” The incident was first reported by The Denver Post.

So just... not gonna mention having her tits out being fondled, and jerking a dude off in public around children then, captured live on security cameras...?

Huh. Weird how that just... didnt get mentioned...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Have the images been confirmed? I keep reading this part in comments but not in articles. Is it really true?

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can view the video yourself...hard to dispute what they're doing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I had no idea the video was available to the public.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago

Yeah kinda. You can see her hands in his crotch, although they seem to be over his pants instead of inside then, and he's very handsy with her chichis. https://www.mediaite.com/politics/lauren-boebert-caught-on-cctv-seeming-getting-extremely-handsy-with-man-at-beetlejuice-performance-she-was-booted-from/

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

you can watch the video yourself

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Just trying to bring some levity to his pants.

[–] [email protected] 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

‘Boobs-out Boebert’ behaves blatantly belligerent by bouncing boyfriends balls during Beetlejuice.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Recently divorced, 36 year old grandmother reluctantly renegs on her ruse after found afoul of fastidious fondling at family affair.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I think you mean Loosely Grope

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Trashy trailer tramp tried traversing troubled truth trove. Tried.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Damn. Dude destroyed the dumbass diva.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Laughable lawmaker lends her left to LGTBQ+ lover.

[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Huh, I would have never guessed public handjobs to be part of Republican politics. Live and learn I guess.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only that was the worst they did

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. This is far from the worst I've read about her. I mean, this happens to good people all the time. It's news because it's, as well put, "another notch."

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess you missed it when the story was broken that apparently Nancy Reagan used to give epic jobbers.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

The throat goat

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If only Clinton had called a press conference instead of getting sucked off in the oval office.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

His only crime was not sharing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Lol you need to read about Nancy Reagan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Have we forgotten the mysterious wide-stance so soon?

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago

All in all, it was mostly a lovely time

Maybe for her and her date, shame they had to ruin the evening for so many other people. For people who claim to be about protecting people from things they don't accidentally want to experience - drag queens, pot, same-sex or different-race people in a relationship - they sure don't seem to understand actual "consent". Which, y'know, apparently involves everyone around them.

and I’ve taken responsibility for my actions.

Really? Cause that's not exactly what I've been seeing here.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It wouldn’t have anything to do with the fact that now everyone knows that for months she’s been dating a Democrat who owns a bar that’s hosted drag shows?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He is a Democrat? First time I heard about that.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't see many Republicans running bars that allow drag shows.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some tend to hypocrisy and say something and then do something else. And if it makes money..... they can turn a blind eye. So not that crazy but yeah in theory it wouldn't make sense.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

And her trashiness isn't even her worst quality!

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

She's trying to make it sound like this happened because she was on a date with a Democrat. It'd be funny if her dumb ass base didnt lap it up.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"I'm sorry, I thought you just had the same name as Lauren Boebert"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know, right? Why go on a date with Lauren Boebert? You already know who she is.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

She's a grandma in her 30s. He knows she puts out.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, because HE is the problem... Not the sitting Congressman giving a handjob in public.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Dawww, she's embawassed!

Whatever, fuck you Bobo! You should be in jail

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

breaks it off

Ow

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way to deal with sociopaths is to get away from them as far as posssible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's always hard...

Yeah it is!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

So she's still down for a nooner with him. Nice

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I’m here to provide levity

She makes much more sense when you know that's what she thinks a US representative's job is

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, folks really are laughing at her (when they're not weeping at the quality of representation) so....kinda levity? Just not the kind she's thinking of maybe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rep. Lauren Boebert (R-Colo.) says she’s scrapping any more romantic outings after getting booted out of a “Beetlejuice” performance, exclaiming, “All future date nights have been canceled.”

A Boebert spokesperson initially denied that the lawmaker had been vaping, before video surfaced showing her doing so at the theater.

I’m here to provide levity, and lift burdens off of people,” Boebert said in an interview with TMZ on Monday.

“So anytime that they’re carrying mine, it’s something that you kind of feel deep inside.”

Asked if her dating life with the man was “over,” the 36-year-old congresswoman replied, “We’ve peacefully parted at this time.

“All in all, it was mostly a lovely time and I’ve taken responsibility for my actions,” Boebert said of the controversial incident, which her Democratic challenger, Adam Frisch, slammed as “another notch in the belt of embarrassment.”


The original article contains 270 words, the summary contains 134 words. Saved 50%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›