117
submitted 3 weeks ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 18 points 3 weeks ago

Pre-Lenin Russia was really fucked, but Lenin didn't end wealth inequality, just changed who had the wealth.

People insisting he was perfect and he can't be criticized will never stop reminding me of modern American neoliberals.

Like, yeah Karen. Lenin was better than the Tzar, but that doesn't mean we can't ask for any more progress over 200 fucking years.

But to get back on topic of press freedoms:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship_in_the_Soviet_Union

[-] [email protected] 5 points 2 weeks ago

… but Lenin didn't end wealth inequality, just changed who had the wealth.

It is unfair to lay that on Lenin, as it was Stalin that consolidated and bureaucratized soviet government against Lenin’s wishes as Lenin fell ill. While Bolsheviks most certainly did loot and pillage like bandits and barbarians during both the revolution and civil war, that was never a part of Lenin’s vision or goals. See Lenin’s Testament, which he essentially dictated from his death bed in a last ditch attempt to rescue his vision from Stalin’s dictatorial takeover. Unfortunately, Stalin suppressed the testament and it would not be seen again until years after Lenin’s death… and then only privately among party elite.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

Interesting, but he did set the precedent of using state power to enforce his vision even when the people disagreed. This eventually snowballed into Stalin which was nowhere near what Lenin wanted, but when you use power like that bad actors will take over eventually and ultimately he is still to blame for that.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 weeks ago

Isn't that still better than only a single state-controlled media?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Of course, because only those two very specific options can/will/do exist.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 2 weeks ago

What options did Lenin have in mind for an authoritarian communist state?

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

None. The goal was a classless, stateless society. The exact opposite of an authoritarian state.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

He was a vanguard single party advocate.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

And how did that turn out?

[-] [email protected] -1 points 2 weeks ago

This goal almost immediately collapsed when he found out not everyone agreed with him. Then he became an authoritarian so clearly he didn't think they were opposites.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 2 weeks ago

That was never a goal. The only real goal of a communist is genocide.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Which further options have you been taught of?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Well, one option at most, seems the worst.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Where you don't elect the editor?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago
[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago

To quote a guy is not the same as to subscribe to all of his actions.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes it is.

The point you're evading is that having the press controlled by six oligarchs also isnt a free press.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

I'm not talking at all about free presses. The Soviet Union didn't have a free press and was controlled by 1 entity instead of 6 - which is much worse - which was my point I was trying to make.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

This is rich lol, coming from one of the most totalitarian leaders russia has ever had

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

https://clickhole.com/heartbreaking-the-worst-person-you-know-just-made-a-gr-1825121606/

You can correctly criticize a system without implementing a better version yourself. It is, somehow, possible.

I do wonder where he would rank in a top ten authoritarian Russian leaders, however, that leaderboard is a lot more competitive than we're pretending.

Do the Khans count? Is there a per capita adjustment?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 weeks ago

Right after the Czar. Literally.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This reads as a quote against freedom of the press, which is also likely the original intention of the author, given what happened later.

I would not consider this inspiring whatsoever.

And no, that doesnt mean that I think the current system implements freedom of the press.

this post was submitted on 10 May 2025
117 points (90.9% liked)

Late Stage Capitalism

1779 readers
190 users here now

A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.

A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.

RULES:

1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.

2 No Trolling

3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.

4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.

5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.

6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS