this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)

Ask

512 readers
92 users here now

Rules

  1. Be nice
  2. Posts must be legitimate questions (no rage bait or sea lioning)
  3. No spam
  4. NSFW allowed if tagged
  5. No politics
  6. For support questions, please go to [email protected]

Icon by Hilmy Abiyyu A.

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 hours ago

I want to be queen of Germany now. First official act would be to throw soon-to-be-chancelor Merz and his cabinet out of office.

After that I would do the following in no particular order:

  • Tax wealth, eradicate Dienstwagenprivileg, implement progressive capital gains tax, reduce tax burden of working class people

  • Decriminalize drug use

  • Legalize abortion

  • Make public transport free

  • Make childcare free

  • Improve public education

  • Transition to renewable energies faster and strengthen the grid through decentralised energy storage

  • Send a peace ~~keeping~~ restoring mission to Ukraine

Once that is done I would hold elections and transition power to an elected government

[–] [email protected] 4 points 15 hours ago

United States, now.

I would release everyone convicted for non-violent drug offenses, allow felons to vote, make it illegal to pay prisoners less than minimum wage, and remove the line in the 13th amendment that allows prison slavery. Then I'd nationalize all existing prisons, close or reorganize them to consolidate, and ban private prisons.

I'd direct money from speeding tickets and other minor fines to the federal government, removing the incentive to pull people over when they're not driving dangerously. I would reduce the penalty for illegal drug use to a fine and direct law enforcement to focus on apprehending the traffickers rather than the users. I'd obviously make pot federally legal. I would also build a nationwide network of addiction recovery centers that are legally blocked from reporting to or interacting with law enforcement.

I'd cut the military budget in half and reduce the number of active duty soldiers similarly, with a focus on retaining the most skilled and physically fit. I would sell excess equipment and weapons to allies and put the money back into developing more reliable and advanced equipment for the remaining forces.

With the money saved from the cuts to the military, I'd implement universal healthcare. Abortion would be federally legal, and some funds would be set aside for grants to local organizations that provide women's healthcare. I would also start a project to create long-term, non-hormonal, male birth control, and make it free for boys between the ages of 5 and 10.

I'd simplify and combine most forms of identification into one card. This card would also include information like whether you've had the birth control procedure, have a security clearance, or are a non-citizen. This card, and replacements for it, would be freely available at government offices in every city, but could also be ordered online or through a hotline.

And about ten million other changes.

After everything else, I'd get rid of the electoral college and implement ranked choice voting, then retire.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pharaoh Hatshepsut of the 18th Dynasty New Kingdom Egypt (~1479–1458 BCE).

She was the first female pharaoh (full deal, not regent), she reshaped governance away from strength of arms and ad-hoc decision-making toward merit-driven bureaucracy, and through this prioritized commerce over conquest, drastically enriching Egypt in the process by building up massive trading networks. She was responsible for some of the greatest monumental construction of the New Kingdom era. (Tragically these monuments were systematically erased by her successor, Thutmose III, because he was butt-hurt that a woman had ruled over men—but he did keep her trading networks even as he moved back toward the conquest model.)

Oh and she wore men's clothing. Fake beard and all. To cement her legitimacy as pharaoh.

As an alternative I might choose Zenobia of the Palmyrene Empire (267-272 CE). She broke free from the Roman Empire in a big "fuck you" battle to carve out one of her own, conquered Egypt, ousting the Roman provost in the process, setting it up as a client state, and by 271 she controlled Syria, Palestine, Arabia Petraea, and parts of Mesopotamia (and thus the trade routes of Asia Minor). All the while she was pitching Palmyria as a safe haven for scholars of all kinds.

She was such a problem that she became THE major enemy of Rome and they committed an enormous number of troops to take her out. She finally lost, and was caught while fleeing to Persia, ending her reign. She'd spent only five years ruling Palmyria, but they were an extraordinarily productive half-decade that had lasting impact in the region as people realize you could, in fact, stand up to Rome.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

How have I not heard of her? Feel free to do a post in [email protected] we're a woman only community that loves hearing about strong women

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Feel free to do a post in [email protected] we’re a woman only community that loves hearing about strong women

I kinda suck at starting conversations. If I just did a post every so often with a strong historical or folkloric woman would that be enough?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

OMG YES!! We'd love that we love strong women. If you had the time that'd be massively appreciated

[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

First one is up. It might be a bit unusual a choice, but I like her.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

It's a brilliant choice, she's perfect. She's a warrior woman who played the cards she was dealt in life and did better than pretty much all of the men around her. Love it thanks so much!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Historians are mostly men? 😉

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago

Haha yep that'll be it

[–] [email protected] 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

We're an anarcho-syndicalist commune. We take it in turns to act as a sort of executive officer for the week. But all the decision of that officer have to be ratified at a special biweekly meeting.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 18 hours ago

Come see the violence inherent in the system!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

I I would replace the real life king, I'd choose Holy Roman Emperor during Saint Louis' time at the french throne. We could make so much happen together without all the infighting stirred by Frederick II
If not, I'd probably choose to be a French king of the capetian dynasty

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Part of me is tempted to go for Mansa Musa, just so I would be the richest person who ever lived. But at the same time, there's another part of me that says I should just become the king of America circa 1490.

Especially if I keep my present day knowledge, I'm pretty sure I could fabricate gunpowder and we would definitely throw a special celebration for when Christopher Columbus arrives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 23 hours ago

Omg I love that, you could literally prevent genocide

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I'm tempted to go medieval England but I don't speak the language so I'll give that a pass. I reckon over queen Victoria's time, I speak the language, hygiene wasn't too bad and there were interesting things happening. Plus the clothes are cool.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm taking my chances on the future. King of England 2400. Hopefully by then the royal family is basically a national pet.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, get to technically eliminates me from the question because I wouldn't want that kind of life at all.

However, it's still a fun game to play, so I'm going to pretend I want it.

I want somewhere fairly mild in climate, but not totally without some variation. The question suggests that it shouldn't be a current nation, and I think it's a more enjoyable thing if I'm not taking over a country that's not a monarchy.

So, I'm thinking Siam towards the end of its existence under that name. Since it's me, not a copy of me that doesn't know what I know, I could probably keep a similar balance between the surrounding interests as already happened, assuming that whatever method of transfer wouldn't be negated by the fact that I'm a foreigner, and that the people would give me at least the same level of support at the beginning as existing kings had.

Ideally, I would get total support in the beginning and only have to worry about messing up, rather than just inheriting the usual mixed opinions about monarchies in general.

It's always amazed me how Siam, and eventually Thailand, managed to keep as stable as they did on average. Somehow, even during early European colonization/imperialism, they kept afloat as their own nation.

So, if I'm gonna be king somewhere in the past, the combination of having at least a partial idea of how things happened and the benefits of the position there makes it the best choice I can think of.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 23 hours ago

Prudent, I think you'll have a good life thrre

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Does pre-history count? Because whatever ruler that created Göbekli Tepe probably kicked 12 kinds of ass.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe

[–] [email protected] 0 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The Pitcairn Islands. It's the least affected by diplomatic tugs of war.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I just spent an hour reading on those islands. Interesting stuff!

[–] [email protected] -3 points 12 hours ago

Is it a place you might find tempting to move to?