Typical pattern: "Scientists find something strange when they look at a common whatever - and it's not good!"

This kind of crap used to be the style of little blurbs at the side or the bottom of an article, but it's in the headlines now. Until you click the headline you don't even really know what the article is about anymore - just the general topic area, with maybe a fear trigger.

Clicking on the headline is going to display ads, but at that point the goal isn't to get you to buy anything yet, it's just to generate ad impressions, which the content provider gets paid for regardless of whether you even see the ads. It's a weird meta-revenue created by the delivery mechanism, and it has altered the substance of headlines, and our expectations of what "headline" even means.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 204 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Lemmy user SLAMS mainstream media, you will not believe what the comment section said

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 78 points 1 year ago (9 children)

    Yeah I made c/savedyouaclick in the hope of getting people de-clickbaiting stories, but I was the only poster afaict. I wonder if calling it newssummararies could help.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Oh I'd be up to help if I could

    Maybe a link or two a day

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 44 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I don't click those any more. I assume they're completely written by AI and not fact-checked in any way. They just suck knowledge out of me instead of adding more.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    No other choice than sticking with the few reputable media that still don't do that. Gotta support them so they don't fall into that too.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    Sometimes the articles themselves are fine, and it’s just the editorial department that adds the sensational headlines. I don’t know if it’s worth throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    If the marketing has the power to go over the journalism to change the titles, isn't it a symptom that things are going downward for this media?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    While we're at it, does anyone on Lemmy hate capitalism? I never see anyone mention it.

    And that Trump guy is really not turning out well.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    I don't hate it, but it's been allowed to go uncontrolled for too long and it has become cancerous to the successful advancement of society.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    Whenever people ask this question, I do this one thing.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    NPR and the BBC still aren't doing that.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)

    Thankfully there are still a lot of amazing news sources that have held onto their integrity. Click here to see even more. Number 17 will surprise you!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    That's a very good list. I just threw out the first couple that came to mind, but it is worth calling out the organizations that are still trying to do real journalism.

    I give small sustaining donations to NPR, ProPublica, and The Guardian. I hope to add a few more when I can.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    There’s something I hate more than clickbaity headlines, click here to find out!!

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (1 child)
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I hate them. I hate that everything is always trying to sell you something or trick you into generating profit somehow. It makes me want to burn down a bank.

  • source
  • I miss objective news in general

    Everything has a spin on it, even if it's subtle

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    It’s the news that Starship Troopers and Idiocracy both parodied. Except it’s not future fantasy, it’s real and here now.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    That's why I stopped reading the news. Instead I get my news here and I have to interpret what they mean for me locally. Its extremely bullshit. Now orange man has bit into NPR and PBS. When that institution disappears, I won't have a leg to stand on. I'll be a mindless robot going to work. Suddenly they come and tag one of my balls with a chip because they said they would but nobody was there to tell us.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    MAN THREATENS TO NOT READ NEWS ANYMORE over clickbaity headlines

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    It’s not new, it’s just adapted to the media format.

    Getting people to read the news and the ads between articles is how the game is designed.

    Journalism classes has always educated this.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

    If you had been an adult during a decade or two before the Internet you would know that a headline used to sum up the basics of a story. For example, picking a random 1980s headline: "Six US embassy aides escape from Iran". Nowadays that would be more like, "US admits Iran plot."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    want to read news
    don't want to pay for news
    news start to use ads to get money
    ads pay for clicks
    complain about clickbait news

    -- average internet user

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    And that's exactly why I read German news only, they are paid with tax money and there's a governing body in place that ensures objectivity.

    Of course there are private magazines and stuff, but as long as you stay clear of them, you're by and large good to go.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    Well played. You got me to click.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    "news headlines" should be "opinion headlines". I'm going back to Jack Webb from Dragnet..."Just the facts, ma'am.".

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago

    You won't believe what this person thinks of our headlines

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    I'm less annoyed if its technically true and I get to sharpen my media crit skills by making that evaluation after the fact

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

    Could have social media websites


    like us


    have some system for selecting, maybe voting on, alternative titles.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 3 points 1 year ago*

    I'm not annoyed by them (I simply don't read them, why would I want to waste my time?), I'm saddened by them.

    Edit: that's also the reason why I read so few newspapers/periodicals. And why I pay for them. I want to support quality work.

  • source
  • [+] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›