this post was submitted on 27 Apr 2025
572 points (98.6% liked)

World News

46177 readers
2928 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A driver plowed a car into a crowd at a street festival celebrating Filipino heritage in Vancouver on Saturday night, killing at least nine people and injuring others.

Some of those attending the festival helped arrest the suspect at the scene, who police identified as a 30-year-old man.

...

“It’s something you don’t expect to see in your lifetime,” Kris Pangilinan, a Toronto-based journalist, told Canadian public broadcaster CBC. “[The driver] just slammed the pedal down and rammed into hundreds of people. It was like seeing a bowling ball hit — all the bowling pins and all the pins flying up in the air.”

He continued, “It was like a war zone… There were bodies all over the ground.”

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Cars are a terrorist threat! We should remove them from our streets.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Actually, I agree. Put them underground, in a tunnel, where people aren't walking.

Walking > Bikes > Trains > Buses > fuck cars.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Don't put them in the city at all, even in a tunnel. If you're going into the city, park and take transit. (Edit: my complaint here is personal; Boston had an interstate running through it, which they buried, and then put a four-to-six-lane road on top of it where there was supposed to be green space.)

Yeah, I know some people can't do that because they're working and need tools, e.g. plumbers, but if we get all the casual drivers on transit it's good enough.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

Conservatives are a terrorist threat

FTFY

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (7 children)

"car plows"

So we only call it a murder or a terrorist attack if guns are involved?

We are brainwashed and numb to car violence. Super sad that nothing is done to stop this from happening.

Cars need to go. Away forever.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (39 children)

Cars need to go, streets need to pedestrianize, and bollards need to go up to make sure cars stay the hell out.

To your point, imagine if this were a mass-shooting and the title were: "Nine people killed after gun shoots into crowd at Vancouver Filipino Festival". "Nine people killed after knife stabs into crowd at Vancouver Filipino Festival." It's so fucking passive as to be sickening. It reminds me of the "Man dies in officer-involved shooting" trope we see in US media because extrajudicial murder by the police is so routine and heavily whitewashed.

The AP gives it the same treatment. The only equivalent I could think of is "Nine people killed after bomb explodes into crowd", and you know why that might be written that way? Because it's not immediately obvious who placed the bomb. This mass-murdering psychopath is in custody; we can say "Nine people killed after man drives into crowd at Vancouver Filipino festival."

Edit: the death toll is now eleven, not nine.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

"gun-involved incident"

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

While I agree that it skews the narrative, it's likely that media at early stages of the story use passive language like that to leave open the possibility of various causes, such as mechanical malfunction or even an algorithmic failure.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (37 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Are you in the regular habit of bringing up your political agenda at funerals and vigils?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 17 hours ago

Where's the funeral?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There are a lot of areas that were designed based on cars. Where I live would be difficult for most of the residents without cars or something similar. The population density is too low to make most public transportation practical.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Good news, in those places a driver going off the road isn't going to hit a crowd of people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

I completely agree. If you look at the comment I was responding to, though, you'll see they appear to be advocating a complete prohibition, "Cars need to go. Away forever." I'm just saying there are places where that's not practical.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That's because they specifically designed those areas to be car specific to serve the needs of the Nazi Ford corporation. "Population density" is a poor argument.

Just look up pictures of America 100 years ago. Trains. Streetcars. Trams. Buses.

Not fucking highways and urban sprawl.

By all means, live in your little suburb with your car. We just want the cities to be safe from the violence they bring.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Maybe it's time to revisit our car-centric lifestyle.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Do you normally bring up your political agenda at funerals and vigils?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Your not wrong but this isn't why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

This is absolutely terrible.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ITT: hillbilly gun-clutchers who don't realize cars are only working when you don't hit something, and guns are only working when you do hit something.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

ITT: people who don't realize that none of us are supporting guns. We're drawing a comparison between the same ridiculous-ass logic that right-wingers apply to guns to try to stall and misdirect from concrete regulation and the exact same rhetoric people in this thread are making in defense of car culture and lack of regulation and safeguards around cars. Strict gun regulation is good; strict car regulation is good. Strict gun regulation would deter many mass-shootings in the US. Strict car regulation (including even basic considerations for pedestrian safety at the slight expense of cars) would deter car-ramming attacks.

"Why are you talking about ~~guns~~ cars at a time like this? I can't believe you're using this tragic ~~mass-shooting~~ mass-ramming to soapbox about ~~gun~~ car regulation. This isn't the time to talk about how we let ~~guns~~ cars be so dangerous and how the direct result was this ~~shooting~~ ramming. The real cause of this was a mental health crisis. Society needs ~~guns~~ cars to ~~protect ourselves~~ get around. What do you mean, 'Do I ever bring up this mental health crisis outside of ~~mass-shootings~~ mass-rammings?' Uhh..."

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›