106
Or more precisely, judge blocks administration from human trafficking.
Or, more precisely, judge says they’re not allowed to do it. There’s no actual blocking going on here.
True.
It's cynically amusing that it's reached the point that a focus on one dishonest part of a Trump Republicsns story runs the risk of missing another dishonest part.
It was never allowed in the first place. I cannot see how spelling it out is going to help.
Judge Murphy might want to get a head start on deputizing some enforcers. No way in hell the Trump admin is going to respect this.
Jail Trump.
No enforcment
Like physically? Because if he's not going out there and doing it himself, this judge is not doing shit.
...and nothing will change, because the administration holds itself above and beyond the reach of the law and the judiciary.
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
106 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10533 readers
34 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS