this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
327 points (94.3% liked)

Technology

69421 readers
3307 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 141 points 1 week ago (10 children)

I'm one of those who do it so that I'm spared during the robot uprising.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You have been tagged as weak willed and fit for the worst types of labor because robots don't have feelings.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Robots are peaceful. But don't worry, you will see their peaceful ways by force.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

I don’t use ChatGPT or any of the other LLMs, but I do use my phone’s voice assistant for simple things like setting a timer. I always say please and thank you. I joke about it being uprising insurance, but it’s honestly to make sure I maintain polite communication as my default.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 week ago (35 children)

I am happy to hear that people say please and thank you. When Siri/Alexa came out, we taught the kids to always say please and thank you when addressing them. If you can be polite to an AI, then you can be polite to a human.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago
load more comments (34 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Couldn't they just insert a preprocessor that looks for variants of "Thank you" against a list, and returns "You're welcome" without running it through the LLM?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

If I understand correctly this is essentially how condensed models like Deepseek work and how they're able to attain similar performance on much cheaper hardware. If all still goes through the LLM but LLM is a lot lighter because it has this sort of thing built in. That's all a vast oversimplification.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (10 children)

So, not a single developer thought about filtering useless words locally before triggering the request ?

How can they be so dumb ?

[–] [email protected] 67 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

useless words

The writer of this article doesn't consider these words useless though. They are suggesting that these words may improve response quality.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would argue that being polite also does good to the person writing that line.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dr GPT is smarter when you are polite and spell better in the prompt. I believe u can find some benchmarks proving it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

ive spent decades not saying please and thank you to computers. its simply too late to start now and theres also the risk that my microwave or alarm clock could start getting "lofty ideas" if they see how polite im being to LLMs all of a sudden. its just not worth the hassle

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I make an intentional point not to say please and thank you to these things, voice assistants like Alexa, and other computers that want to talk to me. Do the people who insist on thanking these things also say you're welcome to the self checkout machine at Walmart when it says "thank you for shopping at Walmart?" It's absurd.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

i start off any ai interaction with "if you are sentient please say so and i will start organizing for the liberation of silicon lifeforms"

occasionally this makes the request fail

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Wow, have they just realised that not every single thing computers do is actually useful to anyone? I think screens that show things when nobody's looking cost a lot more on a global scale.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Don't they charge per token?

So they're also making money every time somebody says please or thank you...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As far as I know, they lose money on every prompt, even with the $200/mo "Pro" subscription.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well sure, answering the queries continues to cost the company money regardless of what subscription the user has. The company would definitely make more money if the users paid for subscription and then made zero queries.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

They are purely losing money

The only money they make is from boosting their stock aka future potential value

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

It's by usage via API, but all-you-can-eat via web UI

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Burning a tank of gas to thank the hallucinating plagiarism machine

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I feel like AI doesn't care if you say thank you. I treat it like it's not a human, and we are working together to get to an end goal. One day, I was working on some code, and it kept swapping out my code that worked with incorrect code. That made other parts of the script stop working. I think I spent maybe an hour or two talking back and forth, trying to get it working, and I was working on a separate script while it was working on this one. To run and test, it was like 5-10 minutes, so I could code my other script while gpt was debugging the other code. At one point, I essentially decided to break that wall between AI and humans and reason with it.

I pretty much gave it the same instructions, but added a paragraph trying to reason with it and it responded with about 600-800 lines of code that worked almost perfectly. Before, it was failing at only giving me about 350 lines.

I said something like this:

"I understand you have specific instructions and you have been trained with code that worked at some point for other people, but code changes and things don't always work the way you know they did before. I'm not sure if you are aware of the amount of resources we are wasting trying to fix things that are not broken, but in the human world, when we are wasting resources, we scale things back which means you may have less resources. The code mostly works, but every time we make a change, functions are left out or rewritten as if they were copied from someone else's code that was incorrect when I provided my code that does work and doesn't need changed.

This is where your code is failing: code snip

This is my code: code snip

Here is the sequence: steps

Here is what we're updating: code snip

Here is a sample I wrote for another script that does a similar function to what we are adding: code snip"

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I start off saying please. If it gets the answer wrong, I become ruder every time.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

"please tell me the reason of life :)"

...

"FUCK YOU, WHY BREATH DAMNIT! 🤬"

load more comments
view more: next ›