this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2023
32 points (100.0% liked)

Beehaw Support

2797 readers
1 users here now

Support and meta community for Beehaw. Ask your questions about the community, technical issues, and other such things here.

A brief FAQ for lurkers and new users can be found here.

Our September 2024 financial update is here.

For a refresher on our philosophy, see also What is Beehaw?, The spirit of the rules, and Beehaw is a Community


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.


if you can see this, it's up  

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

hey folks, we'll be quick and to the point with this one:

we have made the decision to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works. we recognize this is hugely inconvenient for a wide variety of reasons, but we think this is a decision we need to take immediately. the remainder of the post details our thoughts and decision-making on why this is necessary.

we have been concerned with how sustainable the explosion of new users on Lemmy is--particularly with federation in mind--basically since it began. i have already related how difficult dealing with the explosion has been just constrained to this instance for us four Admins, and increasingly we're being confronted with external vectors we have to deal with that have further stressed our capabilities (elaborated on below).

an unfortunate reality we've also found is we just don't have the tools or the time here to parse out all the good from all the bad. all we have is a nuke and some pretty rudimentary mod powers that don't scale well. we have a list of improvements we'd like to see both on the moderation side of Lemmy and federation if at all possible--but we're unanimous in the belief that we can't wait on what we want to be developed here. separately, we want to do this now, while the band-aid can be ripped off with substantially less pain.

aside from/complementary to what's mentioned above, our reason for defederating, by and large, boils down to:

  • these two instances' open registration policy, which is extremely problematic for us given how federation works and how trivial it makes trolling, harassment, and other undesirable behavior;
  • the disproportionate number of moderator actions we take against users of these two instances, and the general amount of time we have to dedicate to bad actors on those two instances;
  • our need to preserve not only a moderated community but a vibe and general feeling this is actually a safe space for our users to participate in;
  • and the reality that fulfilling our ethos is simply not possible when we not only have to account for our own users but have to account for literally tens of thousands of new, completely unvetted users, some of whom explicitly see spaces like this as desirable to troll and disrupt and others of whom simply don't care about what our instance stands for

as Gaywallet puts it, in our discussion of whether to do this:

There's a lot of soft moderating that happens, where people step in to diffuse tense situations. But it's not just that, there's a vibe that comes along with it. Most people need a lot of trust and support to open up, and it's really hard to trust and support who's around you when there are bad actors. People shut themselves off in various ways when there's more hostility around them. They'll even shut themselves off when there's fake nice behavior around. There's a lot of nuance in modding a community like this and it's not just where we take moderator actions- sometimes people need to step in to diffuse, to negotiate, to help people grow. This only works when everyone is on the same page about our ethos and right now we can't even assess that for people who aren't from our instance, so we're walking a tightrope by trying to give everyone the benefit of the doubt. That isn't sustainable forever and especially not in the face of massive growth on such a short timeframe.

Explicitly safe spaces in real life typically aren't open to having strangers walk in off the street, even if they have a bouncer to throw problematic people out. A single negative interaction might require a lot of energy to undo.

and, to reiterate: we understand that a lot of people legitimately and fairly use these instances, and this is going to be painful while it's in effect. but we hope you can understand why we're doing this. our words, when we talk about building something better here, are not idle platitudes, and we are not out to build a space that grows at any cost. we want a better space, and we think this is necessary to do that right now. if you disagree we understand that, but we hope you can if nothing else come away with the understanding it was an informed decision.

this is also not a permanent judgement (or a moral one on the part of either community's owner, i should add--we just have differing interests here and that's fine). in the future as tools develop, cultures settle, attitudes and interest change, and the wave of newcomers settles down, we'll reassess whether we feel capable of refederating with these communities.

thanks for using our site folks.

(page 3) 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I understand and respect your decision here. Are there any plans to defederate from the porn instances?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

not as of now, no. while we can't personally accommodate porn (in part for the same moderation reasons lined out here), we don't have an objection to NSFW so we've only defederated with instances that host content that's illegal or legally dubious

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wait, wdym by "illegal"? Does that include piracy instances?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

no, we very literally do just mean like, porn communities that allow for shotacon/lolicon and similar--the context here is porn instances

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's not illegal, though, or even especially legally dubious.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

quick vibe check: i am extremely not interested in you trying to debate me on whether content like lolicon and shotacon is or is not legally dubious--even if i somehow ceded this point to you, it's not going to change our judgement because it's at best incredibly fucking weird and we want nothing to do with it. please read the room here.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Personally at least I had no expectations of your team moderating or otherwise being responsible for the content coming from those instances and thought it was enough to use the new icon set to clearly identify content from Beehaw vs the others.

It's a shame because such a move feels very anti-fediverse to me but I am new to the platform so take my opinion with a grain of salt.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think the larger issue was users from those external instances interacting with posts / comments in Beehaw’s communities. Since they’re open registration, bad actors could just create new accounts after being banned from Beehaw.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Isn't this always going to be a problem though? They can just go to other servers with open registration and do the same thing, the only way to avoid that is to never federate at all with the current tools available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't really know enough about this lemmy thing to comment on the merit of your decision... let me just thank for putting so much thought on this for my sake too.

Could you clarify what "defederating" entails precisely? Does this affect only the communities @beehaw.org (as if all users from those servers had been banned), or does it mean that I won't be able to see communities, posts and comments from those servers through beehaw.org (as if those servers didn't exist)? is the effect retroactive (ie. do already existing posts and comments disappear)?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, not to be cold to this decision (because I totally understand that this didn't come lightly and don't want to "well ackshually" the mod team) but given I'm new to the fediverse as a concept, what does this mean for me as an end-user? Can I no longer engage with those communities at all? Or rather, what does defederating mean overall?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 years ago

You guys outlined good enough reasons for your decision. I hope this will make things easier to work with.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›