I know Gnome is the default on popular distros: Fedora, Ubuntu, Rhel, Pop OS (it's Cosmic Desktop yes but it is still based on Gnome)...etc. But Gnome just doesnt work for me. I would pick XFCE - stable and no BS.

Before Manjaro and their cetificate shenanigan, I used to use their XFCE version. At the time, it was marketed as the "Flagship Manjaro version". I went 4 years without any problems and I did tinker a lot, just couldnt get their XFCE to break.

After a tough Arch or Gentoo installs, I just want to put XFCE on and call it a day.

What about you guys?

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 63 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That's not too hard a question for me, I've been using the same DE for years: KDE

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    KDE is one of the main reasons for me to use Linux. I immensely like the performance, silence and battery lifetime of MacBooks. But if I have to work with anything but KDE, it's not worth it for me. The only thing OSX does better than basically any other desktop out there, is the ability to drag whole virtual screen between monitors.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 33 points 1 year ago
    [+] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • [–] 26 points 1 year ago* (31 children)

    I'd rather not use a computer at all than use GNOME for the rest of my live.
    For me it's KDE Plasma all the way.

  • source
  • hideshow 31 child comments
  • [+] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (19 children)
  • [–] 27 points 1 year ago* (7 children)

    For those of us that expect room to breathe and make our machine work for us rather than the other way around, we feel like Gnome takes a lot of liberties away for the sake of "simplicity." There is so much missing from Gnome that is present in most other DEs and even custom WM setups.

    The primary contributors who work under The Gnome Foundation also come off as controlling and arrogant in a lot of cases, and refuse to take community feedback to heart, whereas KDE has literal summits to get user feedback on major core features we want to see which then later get added to their backlogs and sprints as Epics. Gnome acts a lot like Apple in the sense that they're very much "we know what's best for you better than you do."

    Now, the singular area I can give Gnome true props in is their accessibility functionality, but that's primarily it. KDE's accessibility is fairly behind by about a decade in comparison.

    That's just my take, take it as you will.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    There must be something about GNOME in particular that some people love, and others hate.

    GNOME is heavily opinionated.

    As such it gets praise from people that share that opinion and gets hate from the people that do not. Many other DEs are much more configurable, giving a broader audience the possibility to adjust everything to their liking.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 1 year ago

    You know how the ending of LOST or Game of Thrones can bring up feelings in people? That's how it was for me when Gnome 3 first came out. I had been using Gnome 2 for a few years and had a good workflow, and then suddenly, everything changed. Back then Gnome 3 was buggy and lacked a lot of things, which didn't help. It also didn't help that the devs took a "the problem is you" stance to all feedback. That said, I use Gnome now, and I like it, it took some years to mature and become good. But the feeling is still there sometimes.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 22 points 1 year ago

    GNOME because it works out of the box like GNOME

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    KDE. Been upgrading the same environment for 5 years just keeps getting better.

    I started around maybe KDE 3?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 20 points 1 year ago

    KDE Plasma.

    It has been great for gaming, adopting Wayland protocols at a faster rate than other DEs due in part thanks to Valve's contributions.

    I freaking love GNOME & Adwaita, but I'll switch back when I deem it better than Plasma.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    Desktop environment? Who needs a desktop environment?

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

    Bro watches videos through ASCII conversion in the cli😭

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 1 year ago

    Definitely Gnome here. Though I have a long list of notes, it mostly just works exactly like I expect with little friction or guessing. I donate $100/year to both Gnome and KDE since they are both good pieces of software, and I love that I get to chose mine. Further, I think KDE is the logical choice for something like the SteamDeck where it's going to have a lot of gamers that expect computers to work like Windows. (even if I don't like it, >_<)

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago

    My computer doesn't really break, I'm Ship of Theseus-ing it regularly.

    Apart from that, the only one among the normal window based ones that has felt like it respects my will to configure stuff in ways that feel right to me has been KDE Plasma.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    XFCE, using it for over 10 years, not planning to change it unless the DE changes radically.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 1 year ago

    This isn't even hard. KDE without a second thought.

    I regularly try other desktops, and I regularly come back to the only desktop with any sort of reasonable thought put into it.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago
    [–] [B] 14 points 1 year ago

    KDE - I love to tinker and own my DE. 😎

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago

    If it has to be a DE then I'd go with XFCE, otherwise I'd probably go with openbox.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Probably KDE, it's the most 'complete' feeling to me with settings and GUI for most things.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago
    [–] 13 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    Cinnamon by and far.

    I've used so many distros and DEs I don't even know where to begin, but Cinnamon got me hooked for the long run. It's legitimately the most polished and "ready to run" DE I've ever used, yet still allowing for far more customization than Windows ever offered.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 1 year ago

    KDE for sure. The modern versions look exactly like how I want a desktop environment to look out of the box, and they keep the full range of customizability that a desktop should, IMO, allow it's users to have. Which is something Windows just kept slowly getting rid of over the years.

    I also prefer to have a taskbar that is ever present with a traditional start menu that's cleanly organized by category rather than the current full screen pop up "activities" search thing gnome does nowadays.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago (6 children)

    any computer I need to be stable enough for work/school: KDE

    any computer whose primary purpose is for goofing off and gaming: LXQt (and I will spend the entire time configuring LXQt instead of gaming...)

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    I keep coming back to KDE time and time again. It's so easy to mess with, I can set it up exactly how I like it without much effort, and it always looks good because someone else did all the work making themes and widgets I use.

    That said, I love XFCE, I'm just trash with CSS so it takes me forever to get it how I like, and on my Surface I can't get the scaling to work so everything is beyond tiny.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    KDE the customization is off the charts

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago

    Gnome for me. I like it

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    Always wanted to like gnome but never could, and xfce is fine but I much prefer KDE, it is verry likely that I'll actually keep it till my pc breaks.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    I'd say Gnome, since I'm so used to it that I feel it doesn't get in the way of the things I'm doing.
    Because that would be my aim: something that doesn't interfere with the work I am doing.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    KDE, always

    Used it since I switched to the Linux Desktop 25 years ago. Quickly tried gnome, and others, and hated it.

    KDE is fast, efficient, looks awesome, is ready to work with, and highly customizable

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 1 year ago

    gnome head all the way!!!

  • source
  • LXQt or XFCE if I have to pick a DE. Fluxbox or openbox if I can get away with just a WM. ;)

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    Plasma for the last decade. Then probably XFCE, then Cinnamon.

    I try Gnome every year or so, but every time I get pissed off with it within a few minutes and wipe it off my machine.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    KDE Plasma, I can't go back to SDR

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    KDE plasma. Coming from 30 years of running exclusively windows it's just the most comfortable and easy for me to use (way more than Gnome). Easily configurable, works. Can't ask for more.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago

    If it has to be a de, I'd pick gnome. Otherwise it's hyprland.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    I don't mind a little "change" every now and then, but still -- "Sway" on my "potatoes" (Orange pi zero 3 and Orange pi 5 max) and "Hyprland" on my x86_64 PC.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    There is nothing better than Xfce, if you dont like the desktop, at least Xfce allows you to customize. KDE seems interesting, but the last time i tried it, 10 years ago more or less, it was a bit buggy.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›