top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 122 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

Ironically having a giant security breach happen in a security focused messaging app was good advertising.

Of course in this instance the breach was not because of the app, which is a good thing I guess.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago* (6 children)

    On Signal you can verify user identify, and you should absolutely do it if were to discuss national security maters.

    This is not a hidden feature, I think it's designed to prevent man in the middle attack. It also work against the "oops I accidentally added a journalist to my conversation no one should know of", which is so dumb that no one saw this coming 😅

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Dont use consumer apps for national security matters.

    There was a vulnerability identified in Signal last year that caused the British to discontinue its use. I dont trust the british government but I am wary of what they are wary of.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    vulnerability

    My understanding is this has less to do with Signal than phones themselves. Signal messages are decrypted and stored on the phone itself, so a successful attack on the phone would allow access to the messages.

    This is completely fine for personal use since the average person isn't going to be a target, but for classified information, that's unacceptable. This isn't unique to any messenger, any app that stores data on the phone is open to it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    People hoping to get randomly added to war chats lol

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (19 children)

    Good. It's the only encrypted channel I trust right now.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    I'd consider using them if I didn't need to use a phone number to register. My friends and family stick with Briar as a result.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (11 children)

    Hey man, if you can convince anyone to use Briar, do that. I have better luck getting people to use Signal because it's way more popular and easier to sign up. And if I want to know if someone uses it, I can find out instantly.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 24 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Security vs having someone to message.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I've tried to get everyone I know on Signal, so far my mom is the only one who uses it and that's only when she accidentally taps the wrong icon when she intended to send me an SMS.

    And then there's my stepsister who complains about not being able to have a unified chat because she and family are apple while most of the rest of us are android. Signal Diane, it's a cross app platform that solves your problem.....but no it's not apple so it won't work......🤬

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Matrix is also an option and heavily audited+ federated. And unlike Signal not based in the US.

    And the best? You can easily selfhost a bridge to signal and WhatsApp.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    How well do the signal and whatsapp bridges work? Have you used them yourself? I tried setting up a discord bridge years ago and it was terrible. Is it better now?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago

    Everyone hoping to get accidentally added to a government group chat.

  • source
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Bad actors are sowing distrust by implying that Signal is not secure. Always remember that the powers that be don't want the public to have encrypted comms and would love to ban private messaging apps altogether. I could also be completely wrong and Signal is in fact a fed honeypot...

    The code is open-source though, and I'm hoping that individuals more learned than I would surely alert us if there were any backdoors/exploits...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    There are many things you can complain about when it comes to signal, but overall it's a huge improvement from unencrypted messengers like discord and definitely a step leap in the right direction

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 22 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    So who exactly is downloading the app as a result of this latest government scandal? I'm going to guess it's the maga crowd because they are this as an endorsement from their new king. But hopefully I'm wrong and it's a broad sweep of different users from across the political spectrum.

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (9 children)

    Why should it matter if the new users are all magas or not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    You wouldn't want the Signal brand to become linked to it.

    "I'm on Signal, would you like to chat there?"

    "What, on the MAGA Nazi app, are you joking? Of course I'm not talking to you there!"

    Ideally you want a broad spectrum of people.

    I know it shouldn't make a difference and people should base their views strictly on the technical and usability aspects of the app, but real life doesn't work that way. Perceptions matter.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • Perceptions matter.

    And this frustrates me to no end.

    Yeah, I get it, you don't want to associate with bigoted people. But I wish people would take a step back for a minute and think. If everyone runs away the moment conservatives take interest in something, that means conservatives get an undue amount of power over you.

    If we all largely ignore trolls, bigots, and bullies, they'll lose their power. I'm not saying to be tolerant of intolerance, I'm saying we shouldn't let them have power over us. Content moderation should take care of intolerance where it makes sense. On platforms like Signal, this means accepting that privacy means protection for both you and things you dislike. Yes, the platform will be used to arrange drug deals, facilitate pedophiles, and enable Nazis to communicate, but it also protects whistle blowers, people living under repressive regimes, and LGBT communities. Privacy means privacy, and that has value in itself.

    Stop throwing babies out with the bathwater.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    The chat space is problematic.

    • There are a lot of apps that don’t encrypt at all (e.g. Google chat, discord, etc)
    • There are apps that encrypt but they are subject to jurisdictions that can or may in the future force backdoors (e.g., Chinese apps, possibly telegram, possibly US apps in the future)
    • There are apps that encrypt, are in countries that are privacy focused but are not for free (e.g., threema)

    This contributes to a fragmentation that makes WhatsApp the app that-you-must-have

    Sure it is supposedly encrypted but I would not bet my money that is without back doors

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    Next up:

    • Signal getting banned in US govt
    • Signal getting banned in the US
    • Signal servers seized, devs detained
    • Signal protocol repos removed from M$hub
  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    It just about always comes down to user error. The White House trusting Signal is very indicative of the effectiveness of the app's underlying protocols and the organization's commitment to privacy. This is definitely huge publicity and I hope Signal endures the limelight.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

    LOL what kinda bullshit comment is this?

    The people in the White House are idiots. They choose Signal because they're either dumb/negligent -or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.

    Signal is a solid app for sure, but these dipshits didn't choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    -or- because they have been intentionally avoiding record preservation requirements.

    It's this one

    dipshits didn't choose it for being the right tool for the job here, as it certainly is not.

    It was, actually. If they weren't dipshits it wouldn't have been a problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    Signal, on your personal device, is fine for personal use. It is absolutely not fine for classified communication as the VP or head of DoD, as there are billions of dollars dedicated to compromising your phone.

    The encryption doesn’t mean shit if they breach an endpoint or account.

    If it was strictly personal chat, yeah, no problem, but they just have to assume the messages are being read by other nations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    For the people who want to use Signal but are stuck in WhatsApp land because all their contacts are on WhatsApp, you should download WhatsApp business and create an automated away message that says that you are only available via Signal and with a link to your Signal account (if you use a Signal username. ) People in my contacts are slowly switching to Signal.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Signal has been with me for a decade. Have had Matrix/Element installed for years but no one i know uses it

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›