you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

Bad actors are sowing distrust by implying that Signal is not secure. Always remember that the powers that be don't want the public to have encrypted comms and would love to ban private messaging apps altogether. I could also be completely wrong and Signal is in fact a fed honeypot...

The code is open-source though, and I'm hoping that individuals more learned than I would surely alert us if there were any backdoors/exploits...

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    There are many things you can complain about when it comes to signal, but overall it's a huge improvement from unencrypted messengers like discord and definitely a step leap in the right direction

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Bad actors are sowing distrust by implying that Signal is not secure. Always remember that the powers that be don’t want the public to have encrypted comms and would love to ban private messaging apps altogether.

    Wrong logic, trying to guess what they are doing. I mean, if you were a god-level poker player, then maybe, but most people are not and god-level players lose too.

    and Signal is in fact a fed honeypot

    Being competitive and protected from network effects (decentralized, p2p, federation, one standard and many implementations, all that) can hurt being secure. The complexity of being both may not be practical.

    The point of Signal is academic level security. It has a clear model and is not doing anything to make it more complex.

    Which is why it is centralized, leading to suspicions and accusations of being a honeypot.

    The code is open-source though, and I’m hoping that individuals more learned than I would surely alert us if there were any backdoors/exploits…

    That's a wrong hope in any case.

  • source
  • parent