this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
274 points (99.3% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

59718 readers
352 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Title from the article. Interesting article, with some good words from our DRM-free favorite Cory Doctorow.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/post/40754848

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 132 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Removing DRM has always been "illegal".

However: German concentration camps were legal, while families protecting Jewish citizens from being taken to said concentration camps was strictly illegal.

What's legal is not always right (ethically and morally), and what's right is not always legal. Remember that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

extremely self aggrandizing analogy to say the least

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (20 children)

I'd like to clarify that removing DRM does lie in a grey zone in many countries, including in the US due to some court rulings. In some countries the right to make a backup of your e-book might have priority over copyright law for example.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but companies who employ DRM have argued against that grey area since DRM was a thing. Something something IP/copyright/licensing/whatever bullshit... IMO: fuck you, I bought it, I own it, eat shit.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Correct... How are they going to enforce their "property" rights when I do it at home?

These corpo parasites are delulu hence why I stopped spending money on media.

Get fucked.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Sometimes doing something illegal is anti-social behavior. Sometimes it's anti-authoritarian behavior. These are not the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have been listening to SO many audiobooks since getting Audiobookshelve ❤️

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Libro.fm is cool too because you can download and just…own the files

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Always comes to mind. Why buy it if you need to crack the DRM someday and become a criminal? Just pirate it in the first place.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Or just unlock protected media outside from States.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 week ago

"Illegal"

Fuck them... Just do it.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (6 children)

From a legal standpoint, is it more illegal to remove DRM or to just download DRM-freed content?

Meta lawyers think the second is fine, BTW.

[–] realcaseyrollins 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've never heard of anyone getting arrested for removing DRM. DRM removal tools are actively sold online with no crackdown. However people keep getting busted here and there for piracy, and piracy sites keep getting shut down.

I think at the end of the day if the copyright holders are getting paid they don't really care, and the police cares about piracy way less than they do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

I remember reading that the most significant impact DRM has is on security research. Individuals don't care about bypassing DRM, but an organization is not going to fund anything involving it because of the legal concern. So if a researcher wants to look into a file format behind DRM, or the DRM mechanism itself, being used as an attack vector, that's not going to get funding.

The defense that companies will make is that they're happy to grant exceptions in these cases, but in practice the company will make the exceptions as narrow as possible to err on the side of maintaining as much control as possible, while a research organization will want to err on the side of avoiding potential grey areas, meaning the exceptions are inevitability too restrictive to allow much of anything to come of them.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago

Illegal = against capital interests

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago

If purchased, fuck you, mine not yours.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just in case anyone didn't feel like reading the article, here's the last (and imo most important) paragraph:

However, without changing the DMCA, we can't expect to see real, lasting change in this space. Doctorow said as much to me: "What we really need to do is get rid of DMCA 1201, that law that makes it a crime to format shift your media...it's the same law that stops farmers from fixing their tractors, blocks independent mechanics from fixing your car, stops rivals from setting up alternative app stores for phones and games consoles...this law is a menace!"

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

Good guy Meta. Fighting for us little guys, downloading terabytes of books, defending against lawsuits. Maybe they'll overturn DMCA?

/s

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Never forget it's legal to make backups.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Unless you "bypass technological measures". Which is a loophole if I've ever seen one.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I luckily live in a country where I may break copy protection if it is to move the content into a format where I can use it as I prefer

Eg I could (and did) legally break copy protection on DVDs to allow me to watch them on my Linux computer

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Over here you can even make copies for personal use or sharing with a close group of friends.

I love the unintended consequences of declaring that the internet is to be treated under the same laws as radio broadcasts. Suddenly being allowed to make a recorded copy of anything as long as you yourself create the copy becomes significantly more important.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago

If that's true, I'm pretty much Al Capone at this point.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (2 children)

jaywalking is probably illegal too

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And the name is derived from an awful slur too. The history of that is really messed up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I will never stop being confused by this law. Just crossing the street cannot possibly be illegal anywhere. I'm fully convinced the entire thing is an elaborate joke by the americans.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Like everything else here in the US, it’s borne out of racism. In the Jim Crow era, most black people couldn’t afford a car. White people driving around didn’t like those pesky walking people getting in their way, so they made it difficult to cross the street. It then gave cops a way to threaten/arrest/persecute them.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fwiw, I've never put drm on anything I've published digitally, and never will.

Not that it matters, nobody buys my shit in the first place lol. But, as a matter of principle, even my crappy stories as a form of culture aren't only for the people with money.

Mind you, that do? I have no beef with. You make your own choices, and I ain't mad about it. But it just isn't something I can do.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's interesting when people are put to the choice. On the one hand they could purchase a book with DRM that they don't actually own. On the other hand, they could look for alternative means by which to obtain the book. And the more the publishers f*** with you, the more you might be inclined to never give them a penny.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

You can swear on the internet, your mom isn’t watching.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago

So do it anyway, not like they could ever know. It's not a very enforceable thing is it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doing illegal things is the new black, haven’t you heard?

Also, how exactly would they catch anyone doing this?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Sadly its not doable with Kindle and Linux anymore. I buy my ebooks since I only read indie but I will only do it from Itch or other DRM free sites.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Oh noes

Anyways

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

i'm glad that there is an(other) program for audible. i like this one better. it automatically converts to a file format i prefer and downloads my books immediately, which is convenient for preorders. besides that, i personally would like to not use the audible app for playback; this is just a personal preference though. i have an audiobook app that works just as well. if anything this would just be me eliminating an app from my devices than anything else.

load more comments
view more: next ›