this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
270 points (98.9% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

472 readers
1758 users here now

Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts

founded 3 weeks ago
MODERATORS
 

Originally Posted By u/Healthy_Block3036 At 2025-03-22 11:01:40 AM | Source


top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As a DNC Leader the ONLY takeaway we should get is that People want us FURTHER Right!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

What drugs did you get into?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This looks clearly like a sarcasm to me.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I'm still confused by what it's even supposed to imply. 🥴

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

That in spite of the numbers that Bernie and AoC are drawing, the Democratic National Committee will continue to push further right, and in fact are possibly stupid enough to see the crowds as validation for having shifted right already, or conniving enough to claim the crowds an an excuse to justify having done so even though they know the crowds are there demanding action against the right.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

That the Dems have been provably and measurably shifting rightward since Reagan.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

capitalist electoralism

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

If only this was a year ago.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Politics doesn't begin and end in a voting booth.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

These people wouldn't have come out for Kamala.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

She was a "colored" woman... IMO the US still has a problem.

The Israeli deliver-the-shit-they-got-80-years-ago-and-all-politicians-are-blind-to-it thing was only icing on the we-want-the-good-ole-boyz cake.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

The issue with Harris is that its both.

Obviously there's the sexism/racism component which is gross, and shouldn't fucking be a thing.

But she's also a genocide supporting, hard-line law-and-order DA. So a lot of people are refusing to vote at all over that.

Would've loved to see AOC run, though I don't know if she had hit 35 in time yet.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

AOC was valid to run. The rule is the candidate must turn 35 before January 20, which she did.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But both candidates were pro-genocide... that wasn't a differentiating issue.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Notice how I said they didn't vote, not they voted for trump.

And, I say this as someone who voted for Harris:

Not voting is a vote for the candidate you like the least, but most people who made that decision weren't actively thinking that, and to pretend they where is in extremely bad faith.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

I don’t understand why even the left in the Democratic Party will not try to help the ballot counting in the red and purple states; at least try to set up grassroots movements to demand the ability to recount electric voting based on paper ballots alone? Or even just use paper ballots like all the other democracies do.

This is something both parties have refused to touch for decades . Even Trump’s rant about cheating the last few years avoided all the real topics.

Until this topic is addressed nothing much will change in the long term