this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2025
782 points (99.1% liked)

politics

22294 readers
3993 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Minnesota Governor Tim Walz Tim Walz warns that Trump may soon arrest political opponents and potentially groom one of his sons, likely Donald Jr., as a successor.

"It's going to get very dark," Walz told CNN, citing Trump's defiance of a judge's order on Venezuelan migrants and calls to impeach a federal judge as evidence of authoritarian tendencies.

He expressed concern that Democratic leaders underestimate Trump’s authoritarianism and public frustration with both parties.

Walz criticized Schumer’s handling of the GOP spending bill and questioned how Democrats will rebuild institutions damaged by Trump.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 265 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Jesus maybe they shouldn't have fucking muzzled this guy during the election.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (7 children)

It became pretty clear, pretty quickly, that he was by far the more compelling candidate for president. If the Dems would put aside their obssession with only offering presidential nominations to minorities and women, they could do a lot more good for those constituencies by getting elected over empty election martyrdom. They need to be reminded that the first rule of politics is "Get Elected," not making futile, empty gestures of being "first."

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The problem is not the minority or gender association, it's the platform. People said a black man couldn't win the presidency until Obama ran as a progressive and won handily. I don't give two shits that Kamala Harris wasn't white or a man. Biden was both of those things and I didn't like him any better. I still voted for both of them because even a wet dog turd is better than Trump, but we need people to get excited about an alternative, not just vote against Trump.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Sure, YOU voted dems anyway, but not everyone did. And it's those others that didn't that you need to consider if you want to win elections. Is it that they didn't vote Kamala because she is female and belongs to a minority? Honestly it's not unlikely that that is the case. Obviously it shouldn't matter, but it still seems like it does.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago

Yeah this is the real problem - the Dems care WAY too much about seniority and 'whose turn it is'. They care more about that than electability or messaging or, god forbid, formulating a platform that actually speaks to the average American that would inform all of the above.

On voting day I'm going to hold my nose and vote for anyone that isn't a fascist criminal. But I promised my leftist friends that the rest of the time I'm going to do what I can to push the Democratic party to actually represent us, and that's what I intend to do.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn't so much blame Democrats as a whole, but definitely Biden. He dropped out late and then "crowned" his successor. I didn't mind her all that much, compared to the orange nightmare, but I was still pretty pissed the Democrats essentially bypassed a democratic process of choosing a nominee.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 166 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Immigrants are being loaded onto planes and shipped off to places they probably won't return from - without having even been accused of a crime, much less tried in court. Supporters of the president don't care because they're immigrants.

Now swap "immigrants" with "jews", "planes" with "trains", and "president" with "chancellor", and what do you get?

[–] [email protected] 71 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (5 children)

That prison in El Salvador is a damn death camp.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In some cases, to places they've never even been to.

It's purposely cruel.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We know Tim. We know.

But hey, our representatives are voting as hard as they can, right? That'll show em!

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's so frustrating. You don't have to warn anybody, it's already happening! You have to do something.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (3 children)

There were warnings at least a year before the election, many people laid out what is to come, it was barely taken serious, mostly ignored. And even now the media and government types are doing mostly a half assed "we're stunned he's doing this, but oh well, another day another decree"

It is too late, there will come an indefinite next term of Trump's hegemony, and when he dies his son will take over as new/official king. He himself might not want to take up the title soon but when his next in line is ready it will start to be brandished about.

The writing is on the wall with how he is already tearing up any legal restrictions laid on him.

The current "proposals" for a 3rd term are only there to get people acquainted with it under the guise of "let him finish the job" but it will get hammered through, objections will not be tolerated.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I can't tell you how many times I was told I was being dramatic and/or crazy. All I have is a bunch of fuck you's for all the people who would not listen to me. I'm so angry seeing "in four years" statements when I know damn well there will be no more legit voting. I am still wanting to slap everyone for being so fucking dense to the reality. I don't think usa is worth saving at this point, everyone is just too fucking stupid and I'm tired of swimming upsteam.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (4 children)

An issue I see with US politics from the outside is the fact that when a party loses the candidate just disappears from the map and the party that's supposed to be the opposition to the one in power is now stuck without a leader. The Republicans changed that with Trump as he kept control over the party during Biden's tenure and that meant that the Republicans that got elected just got in the Democrats' way whenever Trump said something even if it contradicted their previous position...

The Democrats need to wake the fuck up and not wait until the last minute to choose who will be their next presidential candidate. They need someone in the driver's seat ASAP and having someone campaigning for the next four years (LIKE TRUMP DID!) would only increase their chances to make people realize how fucked up things are right now!

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (8 children)

I think the problem with this is, nobody really wanted Biden or Harris. They were just the best we had. Like, nobody is going to listen to Harris now. But people love Trump, so he doesn't have that issue.

Edit: The democratic party does not care what their voters want, they need only provide the lesser of two evils to get votes. They believe that so much, that Harris' entire campaign was to talk about what Trump was going to do rather than what she was going to do. "Look at all these things Trumps gonna do, at least I'm not him!"

Another edit: Indeed, as multiple of you have pointed out, "the best we had" was a poor choice of words. Hell, I think even Walz was a better choice, so it's not exactly like you need to go looking far for one.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 6 days ago

They were not the best by any measure.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago

Political opponents are already being targeted.

They're just going to ramp it up.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

We need more people with platforms saying this shit.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Its crazy that the republicans even at this point is not impeaching him. He has definitively ignored a court order. The only lever left is impeachment to retain our system.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Its crazy that the republicans even at this point is not impeaching him.

Why? They don't give a shit about the laws. With Trump in power, they stay on his good side, they have run of the place.

The USA we all knew is now dead. There is no coming back from this. If you have money in US funds or US companies, move it. It won't be worth anything after civil war break out - and it will.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 6 days ago

That's quite the doom and gloom take.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised to see political opponents falling from windows before the next midterms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

We've all been understanding this even while Walz et al were talking about how they might run in a few years.

Only argument is I see no way trump trusts don jr with even being a figurehead.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

They're gonna put in Barron because he knows how to turn on a computer. That's a step of competency above his other sons. Also, they'll want the youngest one in for the longest-lived dictatorship.

Further, Barron has made inroads in the right wing podcast ecosystem. The other Trump boys are still living in the 90's, they'll want someone who understands the modern era and can influence it.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Democrats won't do a thing. They are in on it. They have been ratcheting towards oligarchy little by little.

They need to be replaced.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

Most of them, but there are ones like him who still have integrity. Don't toss them aside.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›