373
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top new old

You have a right to resist unlawful kidnappings of yourself or another under self defence laws. Yes I know we're not enforcing the laws as written right now, but it still matters. Self defense action is warranted and just. Group defence has prorected Americans from ICE before, for example barricading agents out of a suspects house. Be prepared, and when the moment calls for action, act swiftly.

[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 year ago

Just be aware that you're putting your life on the line, because they will kill you.

[-] el_muerte@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I mean, if immigrants are being sent to an El Salvadorian prison, that's pretty much a death sentence anyway...

You dont go alone and you don't go empty handed. There's centuries of resistance tactics and skills that are applicable if you're looking for them.

[-] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Never go to a second location.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Rights are only what the politicians' check writers say they are no matter who is in office

Terry Stops have been a thing for decades and allows police to stop and frisk people, vehicles, ecectera without probable cause

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You need to roll with a large group to have that effect. And even then the police might just drop a bomb on you.

[-] DonJefe@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

This is apaling. ICE is not even following the law anymore. Shame on them!

[-] in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 year ago

They're MAGA Gestapo, it should be in the countries interest in national security to shoot them on sight (but alas, shooting Nazis is illegal now.)

[-] aviationeast@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Have they ever? Now they are just doing it openly.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

I remeber in 2020 during the BLM riots there were plain cloths ice agents kidnapping protesters into unmarked vehicles.

https://www.npr.org/2020/07/17/892277592/federal-officers-use-unmarked-vehicles-to-grab-protesters-in-portland

ICE was used as secret police openly during the last Trump term.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

Were those ICE? I thought it was Bureau of Prisons people that he brought in.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

They were any federal agent that volunteered. So anyone with a badge in federal employment.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I don't recall it being 100% clear on who they were due to know identification. Mean wasn't it like some federal forest service (okay according to Google was department of interior) doing the gassing for the photo bible bit?

Of course this is what his supporters want, I just hope the rest of the US decides this isn't who they want to be. But I'm not holding my breath anymore , a giant douche filled with a turd sandwich should get more votes than that sepsis on society.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

That's the thing they formed an "interagency taskforce" so it was Forest Service, BLM, Corrections, FBI, Federal Police, ICE, DHS, etc etc etc. You couldn't point to any one agency, which was part of the problem. The other problem is it was an obvious end run around Posse Comitatus. He couldn't get the military to deploy illegally so he made his own little army.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

I have been wondering at what point "immigrants" became "migrants" and why. In my mind, the former sounds like "they came from outside the border" and the latter sounds like "they're always on the move". I somehow missed the memo on this but I've been noticing it for probably over a year.

I haven't noticed until you just now pointed it out. It feels so insidious.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I agree. It sounds a little more dehumanizing to me

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
373 points (99.7% liked)

News

37817 readers
1458 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS