this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
279 points (96.3% liked)

Linux

6530 readers
1108 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

curl https://some-url/ | sh

I see this all over the place nowadays, even in communities that, I would think, should be security conscious. How is that safe? What's stopping the downloaded script from wiping my home directory? If you use this, how can you feel comfortable?

I understand that we have the same problems with the installed application, even if it was downloaded and installed manually. But I feel the bar for making a mistake in a shell script is much lower than in whatever language the main application is written. Don't we have something better than "sh" for this? Something with less power to do harm?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

And don't forget to sudo!

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 days ago

It's convenience over security, something that creeps in anywhere there is popularity. For those who just want x or y to work without needing to spend their day in the terminal - they're great.

You'd expect these kinds of script to be well tested against their targets and for the user to have/identify the correct target. Their sources should at least point out the security issue and advise to grab and inspect before straight up piping it though. Some I have seen do this.

Running them like this means you put 100% trust in the author, the source and your DNS. Not a big ask for some. Unthinkable for others.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

curl | sudo bash Gang

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago

How is that safe?

It's not, it's a sign that the authors don't take security seriously.

If you use this

I never do.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

What's stopping the downloaded script from wiping my home directory? If you use this, how can you feel comfortable?

You're not wrong, but there's an element of trust in anything like this and it's all about your comfort level. How can you truly trust any code you didn't write and complie yourself. Actually, how do you trust the compiler.

And let's be honest, even if you trust my code implicitly (Hey, I'm a bofh, what could go wrong?) then that simply means that you're trusting me not to do anything malicious to your system.

Even if your trust is well-placed in that regard, I don't need to be malicious to wipe your system or introduce a configuation error that makes you vulnerable to others, it's perfectly possible to do all that by just being incompetent. Or even being a normally competent person who was just having a bad day while writing the script you're running now. Ooops.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

To answer the question, no - you’re not the only one. People have written and talked about this extensively.

Personally, I think there’s a lot more nuance to the answer. Also a lot has been written about this.

You mention “communities that are security conscious”. I’m not sure in which ways you feel this practice to be less secure than alternatives. I tend to be pretty security conscious, to the point of sometimes being annoying to my team mates. I still use this installation method a lot where it makes sense, without too much worry. I also skip it other times.

Without knowing a bit more about your specific worries and for what kinds of threat you feel this technique is bad, it’s difficult to respond specifically.

Feel is fine, and if you’re uncomfortable with something, the answer is generally to either avoid it (by reading the script and executing the relevant commands yourself, or by skipping using this software altogether, for instance), or to understand why you’re uncomfortable and rationally assess whether that feeling is based on reality or imagination - or to which degree of each.

As usual, the real answer is - it depends.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago (5 children)

What does curl even do? Unstraighten? Seems like any other command I’d blindly paste from an internet thread into a terminal window to try to get something on Linux to work.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

curl sends requests, curl lemmy.world would return the html of lemmy.worlds homepage. piping it into bash means that you are fetching a shell script, and running it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

I think he knows but is commenting on the pathetic state of security culture on Linux. ("Linux is secure so I can do anything without concerns")

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Can you not just run the curl or wget without piping it into bash, first? This way you could inspect what the script wants to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›