top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 107 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)
  • [–] 61 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Shatter it and probably have it bought out by Elon.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 72 points 2 years ago

    Seriously. The only people willing to pay what it's "worth" will end up doing the same thing (or worse).

    What we need are some actual privacy laws with teeth, so that the data isn't worth as much to begin with.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 80 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    Google says government proposals would "harm America’s consumers."

    Says the company that couldn't stand by the core value "don't be evil".

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Musk will be champing at the bit to own a controlling share of both of these. It disgusts me to agree with them but they're right. This is the single worst possible time to try and push this through.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This is the single worst possible time to try and push this through.

    Which is why it's happening now, I agree.

    But we, the non-billionaires are still better off after any monopoly split. It's hard to express how incredibly bad powerful monopolies are. The fact that another billionaire will be the buyer sucks, but it's no reason to back away from forcing the legally required split.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Xoogle and Xdroid run by doge.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 48 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)
  • [+] 16 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    The monkey giggles. Mozilla completely pivots to adtech & AI.

    P.S. for the record, I continue using a Firefox fork and don't plan on stopping. Criticism where it's due, but I still think they're the best option.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago*

    You know what, good. Maybe it'll cause the people who keep using Chrome because they don't give two shits about their privacy to get off their asses and use something else.

    Just like whole tribes are refusing to move from WhatsApp to Signal, because they say they care about privacy, but actually they don't.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 46 points 2 years ago (16 children)

    Google is awful, but any other company that could afford to buy and run Chrome would be worse.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Heaven forbid it becomes its own company/a non profit.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Non profit under this US administration who's mantra is what rules? Seems highly optimistic. I see it being more likely that Musk takes the opportunity to try and get the most popular browser and phone OS that is used world wide.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 31 points 2 years ago (6 children)
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Take a guess who’s going to buy it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Do Elon now. He owns way too much shit and always tries for a monopoly. Start by nationalizing star link.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago* (3 children)

    So…. What are the odds on fElon ending up owning some of this shit?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago

    Good. Now do Amazon.

  • source
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Looks like Google didn't bend the knee enough.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    They'll bend eventually. Money does that.

    Remember when DeSantis went to war with Disney? And Disney destroyed him and any chance he had to being a presidential candidate and we all cheered? Then Disney went around to make allegiance with all the non-DeSantis Republicans?

    It's all money for stockholders at the end of the day. Not people, not who sits at the throne.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    If they really wanted to change the character of the company, spin off the ad and cloud businesses into two separate things and let them figure out the rest.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    selling android or breaking it up would be terrible since you just go back to each manufacturer making their own flavor with no updates or compatability.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    I used to believe this, before google turned evil. Right now I'd take 5 shitty flavours than the pure shit google is doing. They have turned into a vile corporation that needs to be cut down

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    It'd be good for Android to be mostly its base, the Android Open Source Project. Over the years Google put more and more things in the proprietary part of Android (Google Play Services) instead of AOSP.

    Depends on who takes over whether that gets better of course. If they also put too much in Play Services, or ask the manufacturers for a high fee, yes it's possible we go back to more oem flavours.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (8 children)

    i really distrust Google and I'm glad about the verdict. I do agree that chrome and android should be cut off models.

    edit: cut off from advertising business models

    on the other hand, like with Firefox, I'm worried about the instability and changes that are coming, mainly in the effect on fork projects Like Graphene, Calyx, Lineage, any privacy-focused Chrome forks, and of course Chromium.

    DOJ probably isn't able to guarantee chrome & potentially android are taken over by totally ethical, stable companies/NPOs who will keep the projects open source, or allow an open source offshoot project to which the new organization would still contribute coding people-hours.

    I'm sure there will be some sort of guarantees for stock chrome and android users, like paid services/subscriptions will be continued or refunded.

    but what about users of community projects based on chrome and Android?

    many other Lemmy users have commented how community projects don't really have the resources to keep browser engines up to date, let alone innovate. without Google (which i think is a good thing), Microsoft Edge team could become the de facto direction-setter of Chronium (which i think is really really really bad).

    TL;DR the foss mobile OS community, and especially the foss browser community (considering Firefox funding shortfall and AI/ad revenue pursuits) are possibly f*ed in the a for the near term.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Ok but is this like REAL yet or did they just say they intend to?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›