this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
2 points (58.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

38236 readers
849 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I'm going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.

T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can't speak for another person's intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.

I'm trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?

all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Yeah noncery is afoot, Triagonal is acting like a creepy crawly cradle-robber

[–] [email protected] 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

No, she (an adult) is weirdly obsessed with a boy (a MINOR) 6 years younger than him. This is effing disgusting and I can’t interpret it any other way. Her wanting to be shipped (which is typically a ROMANTIC pairing) with this boy coupled with wanting to go on a double date with him (“dates” can technically be platonic but not in this context) is weird and definitely romantic.

I’m 24 and wouldn’t even date someone 6 years younger despite them being technically legal. For me it’s 20+, but FREAKING 14!?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago

What was the calculation again?

20/2 + 7 = 17, he's literally below the date range calculation.

And arguable you change so much between 15 and 20, I always hated the thought of dating a 19yo at 23. This is way off.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 13 hours ago

Oh my God, this MF has a Lemmy account…

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

What she is requesting is sexual depictions of a minor. Depending on how it's drawn that is probably illegal in the US.

She could request anything, but she requests a sexual depictions of a minor, even though she probably knows that it's most likely illegal.

If it's unethical, there's room for argument I guess. But this goes further, and usually if something violates a law, in most cases we're past the ethical debate and straight into criminal prosecution territory.

TL;DR there's no other way to view this.