I tested a little and while it got janky with the conversational back and forth processing, the voices are an improvement. Maya has a nice sound for sure. I would love to be able to run this locally but I wonder how much compute is required for a really good voice model.
They haven’t released the models yet, but seem to suggest they will as Apache licensed. The voice models are in 1B/3B/8B sizes, so that sounds relatively reasonable for consumer hardware.
Yeah that roughly translates to GB vram, but with quantization and stuff it gets more complicated.
Sounds pretty applicable tho in these sizes ^^
I think this is the natural next evolution of LLMs. We’re starting to max out on how good a string of text can represent human knowledge, so now we need to tokenize more things and make multimodal LLMs. After all, humans are far more than just speech machines.
Approximating human emotion and speech cadence is very interesting.
Hmmh, always the same thing. On release, it's just an announcement with a promise to open "key components" sometime. I'll add this to the list of bookmarks to revisit at a later date. I wish they'd just get it ready and only then publish things.
I do not look forward to how often the Chinese Room is about to come up.
Welcome to LocalLLaMA! Here we discuss running and developing machine learning models at home. Lets explore cutting edge open source neural network technology together.
Get support from the community! Ask questions, share prompts, discuss benchmarks, get hyped at the latest and greatest model releases! Enjoy talking about our awesome hobby.
As ambassadors of the self-hosting machine learning community, we strive to support each other and share our enthusiasm in a positive constructive way.
Rules:
Rule 1 - No harassment or personal character attacks of community members. I.E no namecalling, no generalizing entire groups of people that make up our community, no baseless personal insults.
Rule 2 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning models to cryptocurrency. I.E no comparing the usefulness of models to that of NFTs, no comparing the resource usage required to train a model is anything close to maintaining a blockchain/ mining for crypto, no implying its just a fad/bubble that will leave people with nothing of value when it burst.
Rule 3 - No comparing artificial intelligence/machine learning to simple text prediction algorithms. I.E statements such as "llms are basically just simple text predictions like what your phone keyboard autocorrect uses, and they're still using the same algorithms since <over 10 years ago>.
Rule 4 - No implying that models are devoid of purpose or potential for enriching peoples lives.