17
submitted 5 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

She ceased to be a British citizen upon her coronation (the monarch is specifically not a citizen), so she wouldn’t have been entitled to one.

If a monarch hypothetically fled or was deposed, they would legally be stateless.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

So if a moistened bint lobs a scimitar at me I don’t have to pay taxes?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 5 months ago

And if so, how does one happen upon such a farcical aquatic ceremony?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Citizenship is different than being a subject

[-] [email protected] 2 points 4 weeks ago

This must only apply too the fourteen countries and Providence’s that make up the empire.

[-] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I think she was one of the few people to be exempt from laws as well- abroad she had diplomatic immunity and at home she had sovereign immunity, since all punishments are passed by the monarch.

For Charles III it's the exact same situation

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
17 points (84.0% liked)

Today I learned

10734 readers
86 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS