TIL that, when traveling overseas, Queen Elizabeth II did not need a passport. Since all passports were issued in her name, it was unnecessary for The Queen to possess one. (www.royal.uk)

submitted 3 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 6 comments

sorted by: hot top new old

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

She ceased to be a British citizen upon her coronation (the monarch is specifically not a citizen), so she wouldn’t have been entitled to one.

If a monarch hypothetically fled or was deposed, they would legally be stateless.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

So if a moistened bint lobs a scimitar at me I don’t have to pay taxes?

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

And if so, how does one happen upon such a farcical aquatic ceremony?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

Citizenship is different than being a subject

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think she was one of the few people to be exempt from laws as well- abroad she had diplomatic immunity and at home she had sovereign immunity, since all punishments are passed by the monarch.

For Charles III it's the exact same situation

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025

17 points (84.0% liked)

Today I learned

9829 readers

34 users here now

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]