other evidence of Wikipedia being compromised territory in the comments pls
SPE does not show human nature. It shows the nature of rich failsons who go to Stanford.
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2022
1 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15915 readers
4 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
it doesn't even correctly show that.
As dedicated to confronting bias as they are, I'm sure wikipedia is just as much of a sitckler about citations in articles containing anecdotes about human rights abuses is communist countries, no doubt about it
literally stickler :kelly:
I was reading the wiki on communist Czechoslovakia last night and noticed that there were entire sections talking about the evil stalinist government suppressing freedom of speech and using prison labor with no sources, then there was a section about industrial growth and how it outpaced most European countries with like 15 [citation needed]s