top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 307 points 2 years ago (79 children)

If you're still using Chrome, do yourself a favour and install Firefox.

  • source
  • hideshow 79 child comments
  • [–] 226 points 2 years ago (72 children)

    Let's be honest: Everything that might be "worse" or "annoying" in Firefox for someone is not relevant in comparison to "no working adblocker available". A browser without adblock is unusable

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 72 child comments
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago (18 children)

    True, but if an adblocker no longer works on a specific browser, change your browser! I started using Netscape back in '94, and lost count on how many browsers I've tested and used in the past... Holy shit, 30+ years!!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    30+ years!

    .....fuck off, '94 wasn't 30.... counts on fingers several times

    .....Shit.....

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago (10 children)

    In the past 10 years it's pretty much just been Firefox, Safari, Explorer/Edge, and Chrome. 99% of browsers are just skinned Chrome. Even Edge now. Opera's engine died in 2013.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [+] 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (46 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Mainly that Google intentionally makes its sites (like YouTube or Google Docs) slower and less useable when they detect you're using Firefox, and/or ad blockers (which you need Firefox to use, so same difference).

    It's mostly fixable with add-ons and userscripts (and eventually, one hopes, with an antitrust lawsuit), but it's still a hassle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (14 children)

    I very much dislike Mozilla's direction over the last decade. They're introducing user-hostile features that subtly break normal browsing experience, even when disabled[0]. Not like Google is better, but I'm also trying to get away from Mozilla.

    [0] On Firefox Mobile, there's a "feature" which makes the address bar auto-complete domains of companies paying Mozilla. I noticed this with Netflix - I never visit, but when I start writing a URL with n, roughly every 10th time Netflix was suggested. You can disable this feature, but this doesn't actually disable it. The address bar no longer auto-completes with Netflix, instead it just doesn't autocomplete! So 9/10 times I can write n and press Enter, but 1/10 times I press n and search for the letter n.

    Mozilla doesn't care whether they break features, as long as they can make more money. I strongly dislike this approach by the supposedly "good" browser manufacturer.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Too many people complain about the UI and claim it's "outdated, ugly, unusable". I find that funny because you can make FF look almost like anything you want, and I personally hate chrome's UI.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago*

    Well, you USED to be able to, anyways, but they've slowly moved to a less customisable ui. Now you have to use extensions from outside websites to even do simple stuff like have a multi-row tab bar.

    Not to mention Firefox seems to break them every year or so.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (20 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [+] 129 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 68 points 2 years ago

    Meanwhile ublock origin works fine in Fennec/Firefox Android.

  • source
  • [–] 55 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    LibreWolf if you want security, privacy and freedom

    https://librewolf.net/

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Chrome? A browser that's easily replaceable with any other browser? Huh... Didn't see that one coming.

    /S

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    I'm saying this as a 2 year convert Firefox user: mostly easily replaceable. Sure, I can browse pretty much every page that I can on chrome. However, a few sites don't work the same way - sometimes because of the site's conscious decision, sometimes because of Firefox.

    Take Facebook, for example. On desktop, I can't make voice calls anymore from the desktop site. For a while it was possible with non encrypted chats, but now pretty much all of them are encrypted, and FF is not compatible with that. I also can't watch h265 videos in my chats anymore. I'm still sticking with FF, but I just can't easily say that FF is just as good for everything (I'm still not going back to chrome).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Yeah I'm a 20-some year FF user and when it started you had to have IE as a backup because not everything was compatible. In the late 2000s through late 2010s everything worked everywhere, then with chromes dominance places have stopped testing or supporting certain things in FF and it feels like history is repeating itself. Unfortunately you need a chromium-based backup realistically for certain sites, but 99.5% of things work totally fine in FF.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 48 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago

    It's a good thing I stayed loyal to Firefox. Mainly due to my dislike of change lol, but I was forced to use Chrome and it felt ominous with its owner being Google.

  • source
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I switched to Firefox the morning they disabled uBlock Origin.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 15 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Unfortunately, there are only 3 companies developing browsers right now: Google, Apple and Mozilla.

    Apple's browsers are only available on Apple platforms. In fact, if you're on iOS you have no choice, you have to use Safari. Even browsers labelled as "Chrome" or "Firefox" are actually Safari under the hood on iOS. But, on any non Apple platform, you can't use Safari.

    Google is an ad company, so they don't want to allow ad blockers on their browser. So, it's a matter of time before every kind of ad blocking is disabled for Chrome users.

    Firefox is almost entirely funded by Google, so there's a limit as to what they can do without the funding getting cut off. They seem to be trying to find a way forward without Google, but the result, if anything is as bad as Google if not worse:

    "investing in privacy-respecting advertising to grow new revenue in the near term; developing trustworthy, open source AI to ensure technical and product relevance in the mid term;"

    https://blog.mozilla.org/en/mozilla/mozilla-leadership-growth-planning-updates/

    All these other browser people like are basically reskinned versions of Chrome or Firefox. They have a handful of people working on them. To actually develop a modern browser you need a big team. A modern browser basically has to be an OS capable of running everything from a 3d game engine, to a word processor, to a full featured debugger.

    It looks like it's only a matter of time before there will be 0 browsers capable of blocking ads, because the only two companies that make multi-platform browsers depend on ads for their revenue, and both of them will have enormous expenses because they're obsessed with stupid projects like AI.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago

    Apple has a conflict of interest too: they need to keep safari gimped so that users have to install apps instead of using PWAs, so that Apple can keep getting 30% of the app sales.

    As a result, Safari is terrible and very far behind in standards. It's the new internet explorer.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I still find it interesting that the Vanadium browser in Grapheneos is Chromium based, with no possibility of extensions. I know this is for security reasons but it feels odd to still use chrome on my phone and Firefox everywhere else.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (9 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›