this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
103 points (96.4% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

776 readers
231 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

The community’s sidebar doesn’t list a single rule so I don’t know how they expect to get users to fall in line if it’s completely unspoken.

Anyway this is a rare case of a very tiny community where no one is getting hurt so it’s not a huge deal. But if you plan on discussing news using any kind of acronym I guess don’t go there lmao.

Thoughts welcome! Am I missing something?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

PTB. AFAIK, RTFM N/A. NGL, NIMBY! YMMV, TTYL.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Y'know, I'm someone who gets unreasonably annoyed when encountering an unfamiliar acronym, but even I think banning someone for using one is going too far.

That said, none of these acronyms are without enough context to figure out what they are. Everyone knows what LOL means. USAID is an acronym where the acronym describes what the organization does. CJR is present in a thread about Columbia Journalism Review.

As a general rule, if you define your Three Letter Acronyms (TLA), then they're no longer a barrier to understanding. And then you can use whatever TLA you like. See how easy that is?

Where they banned LOL and a reaction gif, if I had to guess the rule being violated would be about low-effort discussion. And again, I kind of sympathise with the desire to have meaningful discussion and I see where getting a message that just says "lol" could take the wind out of your sails. Banning is still overkill and alienating to your users though.

There's a certain amount of irony if you consider a rule against low-effort discussion in a community that was made with such low-effort that they didn't define and publish their rules

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 hours ago

There's a certain amount of irony if you consider a rule against low-effort discussion in a community that was made with such low-effort that they didn't define and publish their rules

Also, the moderation action itself is low-effort. Apply critical thinking to clean up spam and enforce community rules while also encouraging discussion and user participation? No, just delete and banhammer anything even slightly nuanced...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 hours ago

People use lol to express discomfort lol not just to laugh

[–] [email protected] 17 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

One rule for thee, while a different one...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I cannot express how disturbing that semi-acronym is to my brain.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

But you could... T.R.Y.? 🤪

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 hours ago

I cannot express how disturbing that semi-acronym is to my brain.

I was gonna go with I.C.E.H.D.T.S.A.I.T.M.B.

Or maybe like D.O.N.T. D.E.A.D. O.P.E.N. I.N.S.I.D.E.:-)

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

That CJR story is a weird one. They locked the post and it only has one comment…

@[email protected] can you explain what your reasoning behind these actions are?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 21 hours ago

Wtf? PTB! Fr.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Another day, another SDF story

[–] [email protected] 53 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 23 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 26 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Malicious compliance time. Define every acronym, regardless of whether or is in common usage or not. For recursive acronyms, just keep it going until you hit the comment character limit.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

That would be painful for GNU (GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for GNU's Not Unix, where the first part stands for...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago

You didn't hit the character limit...

[–] [email protected] 11 points 20 hours ago

Define every acronym, but define them wrong (lmao is an abbreviation for Little Mao, indicating a person with an overdeveloped sense of power over a little, inconsequential item.)

[–] [email protected] 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

I got a two week ban from it yesterday for abbreviating Columbia Journalism Review (CJR) the day before 🤷 I was commenting on the posted CJR article.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 23 hours ago

What the fuck. I have a bone to pick against most usage of lol/lmao and yet not even I would ban people for using them.

PTB all the way, FFS. [USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST]

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They also banned someone for a reaction gif. An automod that they gave banning powers to, maybe?

Otherwise, seems to be PTB.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

lol …

wait, ah fuck

[Banned]

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

There are some stories that "fuck" is an abbreviation, one that says it's short for "file under carnal knowledge", a marking for crimes involving sex, and "fornication under consent of the king", from a time when reproduction was controlled by the crown.

Neither one is likely to be true, but it sounds possible. Either way, double banned.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

That's a very strange rule ngl

[–] [email protected] 22 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

“ngl” is an abbreviation, any last words before the firing squad?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

NGL? Banned for abbreviation...

...wait a second.... shit.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, if in the context those posts were low-effort and didn't contribute to the thread in any meaningful way, I could understand. Like sharing nothing but a reaction gif in a discussion heavy community could be seen as "low effort".

But common acronyms? Yeah, that's definitely a strange thing.

Also, isn't GIF itself an acronym? something-or-other Image Format?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Also, isn't GIF itself an acronym? something-or-other Image Format?

It is! Jraphics Interchange Format.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I see what you did there.

Also, you're pronouncing it wrong!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

The Lemmy one is made out of jeans, so it applies.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 22 hours ago

No, you're holding it wrong!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

tbh i didn’t mean to leave in the reaction gif modlog entry that was a mistake on my end

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

Oh, I just mentioned it as a point of interest when discussing banning "acronyms". Wasn't meant to call you, the OP, out or anything. Just found it funny that mods would ban for acronyms, yet in the messages, use an acronym.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

What’s weird is I see a comment on that community using the acronym NYT, so I’m not sure this silly rule is even being applied evenly

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Banned (expires in 300 years)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 23 hours ago

long ago the three nations lived together in harmony

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago

iaDPHtcaptbsmhmh

load more comments
view more: next ›