this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2025
137 points (98.6% liked)

World News

32911 readers
622 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Billionaire Elon Musk, who is heading US President Donald Trump’s efforts to shrink the federal government, gave an update on the effort early on Monday, saying they were working to shut down the US foreign aid agency USAID.

Musk, who is also CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, discussed the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) in a Monday social media talk on X, which he also owns. Trump has assigned Musk to lead a federal cost-cutting panel.

The conversation, which included former Republican presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy and Republican senators Joni Ernst and Mike Lee, began with Musk saying they were working to shut down the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).

“It’s beyond repair,” Musk said, adding that Trump agrees it should be shut down.

On Sunday, it was reported that the Trump administration had removed two top security officials at USAID during the weekend after they tried to stop representatives from Musk’s DOGE from gaining access to restricted parts of the building, three sources said.

The website of USAID appeared to still be offline on Saturday and some users could not access it on Sunday. USAID has a staff of more than 10,000 people.

Speaking more broadly about cutting US expenses and fraud, Musk estimated the Trump administration can cut US$1 trillion from the US deficit next year.

Musk did not offer any evidence to support his fraud claim or explain how he reached the amount of US$1 trillion.

Since taking office 11 days ago, Trump has embarked on a massive government makeover, firing and sidelining hundreds of civil servants in his first steps toward downsizing the bureaucracy and installing more loyalists.

Archive link

(page 2) 26 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

USAID was a tool for US imperialism. It may have done some good but the soft power was expended waging wars and committing genocide.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

It’s good that it’s gone, but this makes me think US imperialism is going to stop trying to curry favor with soft power and kickbacks for compradors, and instead go full mask off and just coup or invade everyone they want shit from. I know that the hard power has been used excessively throughout US history for these goals already but I worry it could ramp up to new levels.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

These are my concerns as well, there's 0 chance this is an end to Imperialist aggression, just a change in character.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It may not be intended as an end to aggression, but the soft regime change tactic is a lot cheaper and more effective than direct aggression.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 hours ago

It used to be, for sure. It seems as though that hasn't been working as well in recent years.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 11 hours ago (7 children)

And now other countries like russia and china are taking up the slack.

yay, I guess?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 10 hours ago

even russia is unlikely to cause as much harm as the US did (though it'll likely be dogshit), and china's effects will be mostly good.

so yay, i guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago

At worst it will be no different. The US installs fascists. Not liberal democracy, not freedom fighters, fascists. If the US were more competent the entirety of South and central America would be full of internally feuding Pinochets.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

You forgot what instance you're on.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

~~“It just burning money to ‘help people’, they’ve never been in the black. It’s a money sink hole. Completely useless.”

It’s a service that my tax dollars gladly pay for~~ I will not gladly pay for that same money to go into your pocket, you fucking nazi.

Edit: was clarified on the particular organization. Should wake up before reading bad news. I stand by my Nazi statement though.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 10 hours ago (10 children)

The vast majority of USAID went to support regime change and help the ruling classes of those we are friendly with. A minority went to helping people. What this means, it is speculated, that the US has realized its last several attempts at regime change in countries like Venezuela and Bolivia have failed due to the emergence of alternatives, therefore it is cheaper to drop it entirely and focus on open economic warfare rather than subtle. Tarriffs, sanctions, etc.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Thank you for clarifying for me. Still don’t want that unelected nazi in control of anything in the government.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, of course. I'm not saying this is necessarily a "good thing," I am more pointing out what we need to watch for. This signals more open aggression, like the United States has been known for, potentially even going to war.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

It is spelled 'Lebensraum'

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 hours ago

Or, "Manifest Destiny." Nazi Germany did find great inspiration in the US, after all!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

…. more than plausible. It’s worth noting just how useful a man like Trump is to the people in power.

He provides a lot of cover for long standing American hegemonic policies.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

What's most interesting IMO is that Biden played the epitome of the post-Reagan Imperialist, whereas Trump is trying to restart US manufacturing and isolationism as though we can hope to regain clear dominance via competing outright with Chinese industrial output. I don't think that's a game the US can even hope to win.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

In theory the US can. The laborforce and resources are all here. But modern capitalists only know how to strip a company for parts

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›