Looks good so far. But it remains to be seen whether the maintainers prove to be trustworthy and can keep up with the updates.

Seems alright so far. It is effectively indistinguishable from Mull, in my limited use. I also see no red flags in the repo's readme, though I haven't looked through the code itself at all or performed a diff with the Mull code.

Thanks for posting this. I've been looking for a Mull replacement.

I'll give it a try in 6 months