all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 65 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Children are safe now. Mission Accomplished.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    The comment you replied to was dripping so hard with sarcasm that it didn't need a warning sign, kinda like when there is a house on fire, you don't need a warning sign that a house is a blaze.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

    dripping so hard with sarcasm

    No it's not, lots of Christians is of that exact opinion.
    But since you apparently think it's fine to not to use /s because sarcasm is "obvious", I'll just go ahead and assume you were probably being sarcastic.

    kinda like when there is a house on fire

    Yes yes, now I see how it's EXACTLY like that. Oh no that must definitely have been sarcasm, because it's not at all like that. 🤣🤣🤣

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I went to a church with a friend and more than one guy started talking to me about their porn addiction… it was bizarre

    I don’t understand. They wanted my advice and all I could say was just don’t watch it if it bothers them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago

    The party of personal responsibility folks. Unable to filter their own devices or to guide their kids, pass the burden onto a 3rd party.

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    VPN companies are now very happy.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Perhaps the easiest way to evade state age verification laws is by using a VPN to mask a user's location.

    Proof no one looks past the 3rd search result.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

    Proof no one looks past the 3rd search result.

    Do you mean third page? Or do people really only do simple searches?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    I think they're saying that if you look past the first 3 results, then you may find something that isn't blocked.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    I wonder what percentage of the people involved in passing these laws have investments in the big porn companies that were threatened by PornHub.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Nah, I'd put more money on they invested in VPN companies, or at the very least, the age verification companies.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    To be fair, this is probably the only VPN I would trust, just the fact that you can mail them an envelope with cash to pay for your subscription tells me that they are putting the effort in to make sure their customers stay anonymous

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago*

    At first I thought "yeah but there are other sites out there." But then it occurred to me that most of people this will affect probably don't know that. And it only escalates with the age of people too.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    XVideos will love this.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 2 years ago

    At this point just let the kids into the porn sites. Like for gods sake I'm so fucking tired of this.

  • source
  • [+] 0 points 2 years ago