this post was submitted on 01 Jan 2025
761 points (95.5% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

886 readers
1339 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Well that's just because God works in mysterious ways you lil silly Billy.

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 week ago (12 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

What god and satan was Epicurus talking about here? Just curious what idea of an omnipotent, omniscient, loving god existed about 300 BC. My little Roman mythology knowledge has their gods closer to Greek gods: limited in power, easily fooled, and extremely flawed.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

AFAIK there is no proof that this paradox was actually coined by Epicurus, despite later being attributed to him. Epicurean philosophy holds that the gods exist, but don't interfere with anything, so it's pointless to fear or appease them.

Hence, it would be a later invention attributed to him.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (6 children)

One of my favourite discussions of the problem of evil is the chapter below. It's a discussion between two brothers regarding God and suffering in the world if the end result is eternal paradise. TW: child abuse, suffering and death. Children are used in the argument specifically because they don't deserve suffering, they are innocent according to Dostoyevsky (I easily agree).

https://philosophyintrocourse.com/the-course/part-2-does-god-exist-philosophy-of-religion/dostoyevskys-rebellion-chapter-from-the-brothers-karamazov/

It's heavy but worth the read imo, and not unnecessarily graphic.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (11 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

You know what they say, the best way to make someone an atheist is to make them actually read the Bible from front to back.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have a friend who was a serious muslim so she started reading the quran and then relized at the age of 8 that the whole thing is bs so she stopped believing. Its funny because there are a bunch of people who tell her how shes disrespecting her ancestors and she should at least read a bit into it. She probably knows more about it than 90% of the people telling her about it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I was also ashamed to find out, there is no tradition! Religion shifts focus and meaning constantly and usually as a reaction. The religion I was born in now says it's ALWAYS been against trans people, and point to the written beliefs that came out of being anti feminism the last few decades and recontextalize it to fit their priorities now. I'm old enough that this lie is obvious and stupid. But this has always been the process. It's been new age reframing old age material into current beliefs that not only have no logical connection to any doctorine or belief, but often defy the very principals they claim to extole. It's always been people poorly copy and pasting popular opinions and priorities over actual historical beliefs.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The simple solution is that there is no "evil."

I like the story The Egg by Andy Weir. It gives an example of that idea.

Alan Watts also talks a lot about that sort of thing.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 week ago (7 children)

You remind me of my wife.

When we met, she introduced me to lots of short stories that made me reconsider my perspective on things. This was one of them. She still makes me reconsider my convictions whether I want to or not. I sure do love her for that.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

This is the most wholesome, loving thing I've read on Lemmy. You're truly a gem.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

No one can convince me that abuse is not evil. Is it common? Banal? Sure. Is it good? No. Never. Causing truama is evil. I don't think there's a valid argument that it isn't.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I learned fairly early even as I was in Sunday school that I'm a better, more moral person than god. And I'm just a flawed person. So what use is such a god to me or anyone?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I mean DUH, obviously it is impossible to have any objective morality without appealling to my own personal, internally inconsistently defined God whose written word I am certainly interpreting correctly after being filtered through tens of thousands of writers and editors and translators through thousands of years, whose objectivity morality also 'works in mysterious ways' whenever it seems contradictory!

Its simple!

Who are you to challenge God's word?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To get around this, ancient fuckers in my country invented reincarnation and karma. That conveniently also gave them the license to be supremely racist.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh no. You have to want to believe and repent ... But that's free will, which is also ... Frowned upon

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Frowned upon by whom? I seem to recall Christian theologians jumping through logical hoops for millennia to preserve both free will and an all-knowing God, specifically so that it would be just when God tortures people for eternity for sinning.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (13 children)

This is sorta the beginners philosophy question. There are plenty of answers, it's not the "gotcha" it appears to be. Those answers unroll into all sorts of branching other conversations but they exist.

Maybe it's because free will exists.

Maybe there's a greater purpose for what we call "evil" that results in more good.

Maybe it's a definitional thing, where "evil" to us is always going to be the most-evil existent thing so if existing evils were gone "evil" would still exist but it would consist of aggressive kitten licks or something. So "evil" can't not exist, but it's not because God can't get rid of what we call "evil" now.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Could god make a butt plug so big his ass couldn’t take it?

Or more PG, could god make a burrito so hot he couldn’t eat it?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Which god was he talking about anyway ? They had thousands of the fuckers at the time.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›