this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
106 points (95.7% liked)

Funny

111 readers
36 users here now

Funniest content on all Lemmygrad

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago

Said it on Twitter, will repeat it here.

The 10% thinking that Belgium, Canada, Australia or New Zealand did the most contribution are truly trolling. A roadbump and a handful of remote UK puppets that only helped the main forces.

The 21% that said they had no idea at least are honest about it.

The 40% that said the UK did the most.. Mentally damaged and surely voted for brexit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 20 hours ago

france is positively wild

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of all the allies, imagine thinking the fucking Bri*ish did the most.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i find france having the same contribution as the soviets more disgusting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 hours ago

There were so many French volunteers on the eastern front AND the French bourgeois loved the anti worker policies of the fascists. For many of them, Vichy France was pretty dope.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

We welcomed the Germans in our country so that they would have fewer troops on the eastern front. That was our contribution. 🙃

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the french got whooped so easily that the germans got cocky

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

France played 8D chess.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if 40% if Britain's contributions to the war was it's empiral soldiers from the globe, my ethnic home region the Punjab lost many many millions to die for "freedom" only to have to fight again and be partitioned by those they fought for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wasn’t the majority of Indian and Punjabi losses during the Second World War from fighting the Japanese in Northeastern India and Myanmar?

Also weren’t the total Indian losses during the war only 89,000 thousand soldiers? Are you counting civilian deaths from the Bengal Famine? That was mostly concentrated in modern day Bangladesh though.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

No, civilian and military deaths account to 1.5-2.5 mill and 90k of it being military. Thing is, India was the British cash cow and we had to pay a ridiculous amount in blood, food and other supplies at the cost of our people. I think I was mistaken by thinking it was Punjab that paid 2 million deaths alone. But that's excluding famine as the Bengal famine alone killed 3 million and then the brutal partition that Britain enforced unto us (YES, enforced they divided the religion groups to make them squabble to leave a weakened and exploitable india) The total death count from beginning of ww2 to partition is up to 10 million

Read this to understand the impact Britian had on India and it's systemic failings that lead to over 100 million unnecessary deaths https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2022/12/2/how-british-colonial-policy-killed-100-million-indians

https://mid.ru/en/press_service/articles_and_rebuttals/rebuttals/nedostovernie-publikacii/1847688/#%3A%7E%3Atext=Using+average+statistical+data+and%2CBritish+colonial+rule+in+India.

https://www.jasonhickel.org/blog/2023/1/7/on-the-mortality-crises-in-india-under-british-rule-a-response-to-tirthankar-roy

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

the war (against Germany) was won in early 1943 after Stalingrad, the rest was grinding it out to that conclusion. the US invaded to prevent Soviet occupation of all of Europe in the wake of Germany's defeat

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the funny part is that the US army understands this perfectly well

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ironically british material aid, despite overall of much lesser quantity, was more of a help. Because it arrived when the soviets needed it most.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 15 hours ago

Like Gandalf, they arrive precisely when they intend to.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

Lol, France.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And what did the UK do during WW2? Mostly, they bombed civilians. But somehow the Soviets get solely blamed for war crimes in German lands.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago

And what did the UK do during WW2?

Firebombed east Germany so the future Soviet occupation zone would be as destroyed as possible

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago

New Zealand: 2%

the threat of the Bob Semple tank being deployed was why Hitler shot himself

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 days ago

Seeing how this poll changes over time is most telling. In the early post war years everyone knew the Soviets did the heavy lifting and sacrificed the most.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

*this poll was taken in The Economist’s London headquarters

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

In the west is not propaganda, its factual reporting 🤓

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they only asked around the UK?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago

yeah it's a UK poll

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

These same disinformed westoids are so confident in their understanding of the Ukraine proxy war and have such strong & consensual opinions about it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 days ago

Makes sense that Germany is the most correct even if only by a little.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (1 children)