This is incredibly reductive and makes us look like idiots who don't understand "intent".

I get it, fuck cars, but this is ridiculous and only serves to make us look like a joke

Murder is with the intention to kill. This would apply for using a car as a weapon as well and courts do go after these cases in practice, of sniping a target with a car.

But they are too lenient on deathly accidents with gross negligence.

My friend's mom got run over recently. The guy had the alcohol percentage that indicated he'd don't at least ten shots of hard liquor in an hour and he was going well over the speed limit. He got her so hard it crumpled the front of his truck.

But in Cali, since it's a first time offence, he's getting like, a thousand dollar fine. The cremation is going to cost more.

Innocent until proven guilty.

Luigi didn't kill that CEO as far as we know, and titles like this don't help an innocent man.

And if you setup a system were people die preventable, unnecessary deaths the cops will work for you.

So, luigi should have used a car instead?

Got it.

True for Germany, too. The killers sometimes even get to keep their drivers licenses.

It could be hard to explain why he had to drive it up on the sidewalk and squeeze between the curb-parked cars and the building on accident. And also why it was covered in silencers.

Works for the Walton family. You know, for those nights of heavy drinking, where you just wanna bounce some peasants off your grill.

And if you kill a CEO is terrorism

Does this work for car bombs? Asking for a friend