Trump is for sale. He's not even trying to hide it this time.
this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
48 points (100.0% liked)
politics
19240 readers
2324 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
But will it cost $1M to the inauguration or $15M to the Trump library?
Who wants to bet that ByteDance just bought a LOT of Trump Steaks? The gold paint makes it Au-spicious!
Burn it down, end vertical videos! You're next, meta.
Honestly, I'm not in favor of the TikTok ban (since it's just regulatory capture for Facebook) but I'm like 50/50 on it now just to spite Trump.
since it's just regulatory capture for Facebook
Yes and no. Ultimately it will be that, but that's not the reason. The reason isn't the bullshit privacy concerns either. It's the amount of influence the Chinese government can exert by tweaking the algorithm. TikTok already proved congress' point when they had all those people call their congress person to protest the ban. Congressional offices got flooded with calls from people who had no idea what was going on, and many of which were too young to be voters. Having an adversary control the information of such a large portion of the population is a dangerous thing.
I agree but X, Facebook and Google wield even more power. Corporations aren't loyal citizens - no company should have as much power as these companies have collected.
In this election Elon demonstrated what so many of us have warned about for the past decade with the consolidation of media... and our traditional media outlets are all owned by billionaires (is the NYT guy technically a billionaire - he might just have hundreds of millions) so its not like traditional media will save us.
I don't disagree about anything you said. TikTok is just an easier target and a more obvious threat because of its connections to China.
I would be more concerned about a us corp rather than something that just wants to destroy america
I wouldn't. All corporations are bastards - a corporation based in a country with strict government controls is just as much a bastard and may be imbued with additional intent.
I'm more concerned about privacy from a US Corp, but not the controlling information element. US companies have at least some stake, however small that may be, in there being a US...
Dangerous thing for their control. The danger is the same to the users either way.
Trying to get his protection money