this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
370 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19240 readers
2464 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Donald Trump, once critical of Project 2025—a conservative policy agenda led by the Heritage Foundation—has softened his stance, calling parts of it “very conservative and very good.”

Despite distancing himself from the 900-page plan during his campaign, Trump has nominated key contributors to his second administration, including Russ Vought and Brendan Carr.

Critics claim this signals alignment with the project’s goals, which include expanding executive power and limiting civil service protections.

Trump denies full involvement, while Democrats and watchdog groups argue the initiative reflects his broader conservative agenda.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago
[–] [email protected] 200 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He was never critical of it. I can't stand the media lying all the time.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah I remember before he was saying the total equivalent of "Project2025 is just a coffee boy, nothing to do with me."

Now, which anyone absolutely could have predicted: "Oh, but how convenient it is to have a database of stooges who were vetted to suck up to me! Might as well use it!"

Media sane-washed the fuck out of Project2025 which everyone with two braincells unwashed by propaganda to put together, knew this was the plan all along.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago

We have a concept of a plan.... anyone not thinking he was talking about project 2025 was a fucking idiot.

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 week ago

to the surprise of no one who was actually listening

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Known liar lied about thing. Tune in at 11 for more of the same."

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

"I'm lying right now. I won't be here at 11. I'll be coked out with a hooker and the night shift has this."

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago

We're all completely shocked

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That man's obituary will be a best seller. Everyone wants a copy.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’d wipe him from my memory if I could.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The greatest theft is that we all collectively are being forced to burn significant amounts of our lives thinking about this man-child's thoughts and actions. We both spend the time poorly and lose the ability to do something productive instead.

Hundreds of millions of human-hours, every single day, wasted. It's not crazy to infer this one person is disabling a significant part of human progress.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'd make a pilgrimage to piss on his grave, but it will probably be in Florida, and nothing could get me to set foot in that state!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You mean like the grave of his wife on his golf course that is oddly out of place?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Man I wish this said prisoner of year.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

I assume prisoner of the year could be rehabilitated

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump voters never actually cared. If you were fooled it was willingly.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

I'm sure the Dems who sat it out thought it out carefully. /s

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Wait shouldn't it all be 1s in this case? Like no way this is a surprise.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Versions of P2025 have been around for decades while Democrats did nothing to try and counter the proposals, and in many cases fully supported HF written legislation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's all the Democrats fault that Republicans are doing this. Fuck off

For fuck's sake, doesn't it ever get tiring trying to blame absolutely everything on the Democrats?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

If course it's not their fault Republicans are doing this. It's their fault they are doing a shit job of fighting back

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

HF associated businesses in my area started selling Ukrainian soil after the election. it makes me sick

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

He never changed his tune. He's always been fully behind this.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He’s (soon to be, again) the CEO of The United States… just saying.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Deposition has been tried, but so far has been unsuccessful.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Just need someone with better equipment.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

But he has been very successful on the other D's at least

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

I read Agenda 47 (his official platform) and tbh it didnt sound too different from Project 2025. This should come as a shock to absolutely nobody with at least half a braincell. Lets hope that this horror show ends in four years because if it doesn't then we can prepare for hell.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Back when P2025 hit popularity, I saw like 50 videos of "he doesnt agree with it, he's doing Agenda 47" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agenda_47

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

LOL, "changes tune".

You mean, he LIED about it?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

I read Agenda 47 (his official platform) and tbh it didnt sound too different from Project 2025. This should come as a shock to absolutely nobody with at least half a braincell. Lets hope that this horror show ends in four years because if it doesn't then we can prepare for hell.