this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
24 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

8 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the federated social networking ecosystem, which includes decentralized and open-source social media platforms. Whether you are a user, developer, or simply interested in the concept of decentralized social media, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as the benefits and challenges of decentralized social media, new and existing federated platforms, and more. From the latest developments and trends to ethical considerations and the future of federated social media, this category covers a wide range of topics related to the Fediverse.

founded 2 years ago
 

I'm just curious, since I tend to get attached to my accounts but I also like having access to all information so I don't want to use a defederated instance. If, say, kbin got overrun by bad actors and was defederated by everyone else, is the only option to jump ship? Unfortunately I don't have the capability to selfhost or I would to avoid such problems.

What are your contingency plans if such a thing occurs?

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Right now I have a Beehaw account, and a kbin account. I decided to go with kbin overall, but if kbin screwed the pooch tomorrow I technically have a back up to continue on largely unfettered.

That being said I'm 40 and I don't have time for this shit anymore. I'm at the point now where the moment the next medium-level-annoyance occurs I'm just gonna start deleting bookmarks and moving on with my life. Ain't got no time for this shit. I can get my news in a million other places without Reddit, Lemmy, Beehaw, Jigsaw, Yeehaw or what-the-fuck-ever-else lol.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Same. The beauty of the internet is the freedom of movement. You can have one account or many accounts across the internet, and it doesn't matter. You can go where you're treated best without tolerating the bullshit of a platform or instance if it does not suit you. Speaking of news, RSS feeds have been my greatest ally in sourcing decentralized information that I choose.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm hoping that the ability to migrate accounts across instances will become a thing in the future, for situations like that. It would help reduce the pressure to stay in one place because you've put so much time into it, which is one of the most unhealthy traits of social media imo.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I believe it's a planned feature (for Lemmy, at least), and Mastodon supposedly already has something like that in place.

Being able to just have one account for the entire Lemmyverse could also be nice, but is probably a bit of a far-fetched idea for the time being.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

My strategy has been to make multiple accounts on different instances, spread myself across different communities and not to put all my eggs into one basket or get attached to any one community.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@rosatherad @polaroid This is very much how it works with Mastodon, you can basically export your data and hop to another instance whenever you like!

Honestly this is how it should work, for all of the #Fediverse. Migration should not be a second thought, but an integrated and assumed part of using the fediverse. I've jumped servers 3 times on Mastodon, because I kept finding a "better" home for myself and my interests. Finding the right place takes time!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I completely agree about the migration. I guess it would make some moderation a little more tricky - like if a user got banned, can they migrate? I guess migration would only be through federated instances? I would imagine that a migration would involve carrying around some data about corrective action that had been taken previously?
I don't think those are insurmountable questions, though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I already have three different accounts - and at some point (when things stabilize) I'll most likely migrate my account to one of them, because I prefer a bit smaller "local".

I'm hoping import/export tools will come along soon(ish) - I don't want to add all my communities manually

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If it gets defederated by instances I care about, then i'd migrate my account.

One of the things the Lemmy devs community need to work on is migration tools. Mastodon, for instance, has tools to migrate your account to another instance that would carry your followings and such. I'd expect something that at least takes the communities/magazines I'm subscribed to with me.

As I do not use kbin, i don't know if it has similar tools, but in any case, my response is the same.

Edit: there is a difference in migrating a microblogging account and migrating a threadiverse account that i'd care about, for instance. In microblogging, past posts do not care as much, it's a more ephimeral thing -I have autodelete my posts set on, for example-. On the other hand in the threadiverse, there may be more timeless meaningful posts that I may care about not being lost and want to take with me if I migrate instances. Because of that, I think migration in the threadiverse is more complex and i'd like the migration tools to reflect that too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

@brunox unfortunately it doesn't have similar tools as of yet but I imagine they'll be worked on eventually!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy, and I guess kbin too as I understand it's newer, are still in a very early stage of development (Lemmy is now in version 0.17 in my instance). The bump in users may bring interested to developers and there would probably be an acceleration. No idea where the priorities in development are right now though.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Lemmy devs made some sort of post where they said their priorities right now are stability and bug fixes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, i saw a link to a statement of theirs after I put up this message.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

i used to be on beehaw, they federated from lemmy.world, so i moved to kbin

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm new to all this and keep seeing the word "defederated" crop up particularly with regard to Beehaw. Can someone ELI5 what being defederated means?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

@Kwaker76 tldr defederation is disconnecting from the rest of the fediverse (or whatever specific instances you don't want to talk to). I think there are tiers to it but that's the gist.

Some people are salty but beehaw defederated from sh.itjustworks and Lemmy.world as a temporary stopgap until better modtools are available to prevent getting harassed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By default all instances communicate with each other if people subscribe from one to another. If one instance doesn't want to talk to another instance for one reason or another, they can block it (defederate from it) and this stops the traffic between them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Depends on how the instance is set up, there is also an allow list mode where everything is blocked by default.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An easy-ish way to explain it is to use the example of email. Gmail, Outlook, Proton, your private email server...they all are independent of each other but can interact with each other. That interaction is "federation". Kbin, Lemmy, and even Mastodon, PeerTube, et al can interact with each other even though they are independent of each other, yet alone not the same "usage" (i.e., link aggregators vs. microblogs vs video hosting...).

Defederation simply means ending the interaction. The instance will still operate as is, but will not interact with what it has defederated from. In the case of Beehaw, they still interact with the rest of the Fediverse, but not with the instances they blocked.

To circle back to the email example, if your private email server defederated from Outlook, you'd still be able to send/receive email from the others, but not Outlook.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Imo email is the perfect metaphor for this. You explain how email works and how even though Gmail looks different from outlook, both gmail and outlook users can interact with each other in the same email thread. Then, you say "now replace email with reddit/Facebook/Twitter/Instagram." I feel like I could explain this shit to my dad with this metaphor.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have 3 differents accounts on different instances with the same username. Moving to another instance would be seamless for me, even though my post and comment history would be gone.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I have multiple under the same username too but I still fear for when it might be taken, for example x_x aaah

I hope people develop a transfer option soon (with limitations of course).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I have multiple accounts on different instances with different usernames. I wouldn't blink an eye if I lost my post and comment history as I keep a local copy of posts and comments I like and move on. Would love to see a transfer option, but there is something special about packing up and starting over again where no one knows my name or has some preconceived notion about who I am as a person because I wrote an opinion they did not like.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What exactly is an instance? Is it an EC2, a container somewhere, something else?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

An instance is an individual installation of the (Lemmy / Kbin / Mastodon) system. One person might be hosting something on Docker, another might pay a web host, another might just have an old Linux box they set up with a static IP and such. Each instance is self-contained and could function as an independent entity but there are also tools built in that let those independently hosted instances talk and share.

I like to liken it to email providers for simplicity. Gmail and Hotmail are independently hosted, COULD function as independent, internal only systems... but they use common protocols to talk and share email.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Oh instant leave and make a new account for me. The freedom is the entire point to me. Any instance that thinks they are above that ain't for me.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i'll switch to another instance, although it'd be nice to be able to transfer my kbin account to other kbin instances just in case

edit: also y'know, to preserve stuff like posts or comments since that could be quite important

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I currently have accounts with four different instances, and I expect to have more. I jump between them as the mood hits me.

I presume that if one of them is defederated by another instance, that will just figure in to whether or not I'm in the mood to spend time there at a given moment. And if one of them turns toxic enough to drive me away... it'll drive me away.

I don't think any of it's worth worrying about. The whole fediverse thing seems to be very fluid, and I count that as a good thing.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Beehaw defederated from from a couple instances so I left and came to kbin.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I'd probably just start fresh w/o any porting.

I think that it's not a priority at the moment but if/when there are clearer bad faith actors in charge of a popular instance, I think devs will tackle it.

load more comments
view more: next ›