Discussion about all things music, music production, and the music industry. Your own music is also acceptable here.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
I’m curious what kind of music you listen to that the platforms keep recommending AI-generated music. I don’t think I’ve ever been recommended AI music (yet) on spotify or youtube.
But to answer your question, sometimes I search a specific genre I want on youtube music and check out the community playlists. I listen to them until I hear something good, then I check out the artist from there.
I wondered the same thing actually.
After some googling I saw two trends emerge so far that impacted me.
The metalcore one hit me hard as I just got into the genre and don't yet have enough familiarity to find the generated stuff uncanny.
Basically that's why it's music discovery that's impacted - not listening to already established bands.
As an example of this, one of my favorite bands is VAST (Jon Crosby) but he's pretty inactive and doesn't report songs that have been mistakenly added to his artist profile. I know this artist so well that I can tell within seconds if it's actually him or not. So this AI problem is much more manageable for bands I already know and love.
Discovering new music however, has become a terrible experience full of disappointment and confusion.
How are fake artists able to add songs to real artists profile? I'd assume it would be impossible for me to make a fake The Weeknd song and add it to Spotify?
As for new artists that get recommended, a quick search should be able to make it clear if an artist is a real person / group no? With tour dates or pictures and stuff?
As for new artists that get recommended, a quick search should be able to make it clear if an artist is a real person / group no? With tour dates or pictures and stuff?
There are many artists who are human but do not post their pictures and do not do live gigs.
Well, in the cases that I saw documented it happened in one of two ways.
Spotify assumes a record label submits good faith information. Many of these impersonation attempts come from "brand new" lables like "Gupta Music" and such. Since they are in the system as a label, it's more permissive and Spotify generally assumes that it's not their place to ask why a Band using one label is suddenly using another. These are the worst offenders and actually impersonate real artists.
Another approach that's been reported is to not actually impersonate the artist, but to confuse the user that this is the artist visually. Take for example, The Weeknd - AI artists might upload a band named "Weeknd" or "The Weekend" or some other similar permutation - banking on genre similarity to get the algorithm to present you the song and hoping that you don't notice the misspelling. These are still bad, but a bit less so since I can usually find the real band page for the "right" info.
As for new artists that get recommended, a quick search should be able to make it clear if an artist is a real person / group no? With tour dates or pictures and stuff?
I echo xuxxun's feedback here, the newest bands often lack any sort of presence - especially with their first single or EP. A notable one back when they first released was Apocalypse Orchestra - basically ZERO info on the artist except for a newly created facebook page with no images or anything. Obviously that changed in just a few short months. It's definitely not a method that would reliably sort AI from Human - but I do agree that it's more likely to catch the AI stuff.
For discovery, check out https://rateyourmusic.com/! You can rate music and then use automated suggestions, or better yet, go on albums you like and check out profiles of people that made reviews that resonate with you for other stuff they like. It's old-school, based on humans! You can look into charts by genres as well.
Instead of collecting a physical music library, you can consider DRM-free digital as well. You can buy albums in such formats at Bandcamp, Qobuz, 7digital. Of course you can sail the high seas as well once in a while. Personally I'm proud to support artists, but I have much less scruples concerning copyright over music made by musicians that have passed away.
Bandcamp, Qobuz, 7digital
Yup, I do that where possible now. Usually only for albums though.
I also buy a lot of band merch these days and try to go when they play locally.
I only take to the high seas in the event I can't find a particular hifi release or something equally niche and eBay is no help.
CD's have a nostalgia appeal to it for me, and since I'm finally financially stable I've been wanting to get back into collecting physical media. It's just hard because not many new bands bother with physical media at all anymore. At least outside of limited run releases.
As an aside, I don't get the resurgence of tape players at all! Tape being lower fidelity coupled with the shorter lifespan was something I thought people disliked.
UPDATE:
RYM is awesome. Thank you!
I suggest you check out the feeds on Bandcamp. I find a lot of great new music that way. If you like comedy, lots of comedy shows have musical guests. Late Stage Live for example has great musical guests that may be new to you.
Generally speaking, corpos like Spotify are more interested in paying Joe Rogan than helping you find quality music.
feeds on Bandcamp.
I have a Bandcamp account, but weren't they acquired and sorta lost their souls as well? I'll go check it out again and see what's there!
They were bought and sold by Epic Games. I've been buying albums off there since I left Spotify after Joe Rogan joined it. I haven't noticed a difference in that aspect since all of their fuckery.
Yes that's somewhat true but it has mostly translated to less programming generally and especially fewer "bandcamp fridays"
the feeds are still pretty good and you can see what indie music people are actually buying
Been getting most of my new stuff via youtube recommendations, not of music but music videos. Then if I like it I track them down elsewhere and listen to more tracks
YouTube music is good enough
Netlabels, music magazines, curators such as https://www.etherdiver.com/category/other-peoples-music/ mastodon hashtags and groups, lemmy groups...
Radiofreefedi.net
Looks like this is about to go away. 😢
EDIT: Looking at the persons thread as to why they are shutting down is... odd? Like, okay dude, you aint handing this over to anyone and nuking it - being an ass about it doesn't help. And I say that not as a random internet denizen, but someone who supports multiple websites including tucson.social. I know there will be a day to dim the lights or pass the torch, but I'd never play up being the victim quite like this creator has.
Read their blogposts, including the older ones, before you judge. The person has recieved a loooot of harrasement behind the scenes, so I would ask you to not say mean things that contribute to it. The station is still live and has a great directory available of hand curated fediverse artists. The ethos of ethical music discovery will be continued, one way or another, by the community, even after the station closes down.
I read a bit of it. And while I understand the desire to get away from folks on the internet being harassing. That is the problem of the internet right now. I'd be remiss to say that if I had a thin skin, Tucson.social would be a lot harder to run. I'm not excusing the meanness of the internet when I say this, after all, it's one of tucson.social's goal to deal with that. It's just a pragmatic fact.
There's also the fact that the Creator has no desire to hand this off. I understand that is work. And that I am not entitled to their work. However, it seems to perform a defeatist narrative. Which just doesn't feel constructive.
I'm in no way trying to be mean.
It's just that this Creator is coming across as "taking his/her/their ball and leaving." It kind of makes it harder for the community to pick up where they left off. No platform, no code base. And I think it's fair to criticize that. It comes across as "returning the meanness they received and redirecting it at people with good intentions".
I'm the type of person who is well resourced enough to pick this up and continue. Had I known about this project earlier, I might have been pitching in this entire time. But reading these posts now make me feel pretty unwelcome at least in that capacity.
I too am optimistic about community picking up where they left off. It's just that it's a lot harder to do when there's not even ashes to rebuild from.
I'm sure the Creator is a good person. And I have no ill will against them. But I am a little bit upset that what they built will be lost in entirety.
I think, going forward, open source will be a requirement for any sort of platform like this for me. I just don't want to be forced to lose something good because the Creator has made that decision for me.
But to your point, I probably shouldn't have called them an ass.
As an aside, I think you shouldn't be recommending this site. If it's going to shut down, then what is the point of learning about this? There certainly isn't any ability to swoop in and try to keep it going. I hope the existing user base enjoys the sunset celebration! But as a new user it just doesn't make sense.