this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
27 points (84.6% liked)

Open Source

31028 readers
599 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maybe I've installed too many plugins? I have close to 20.

Edit: It was just an issue on Arch Linux.

No, I am 40 plugins all active and they have not changed my browser load time almost at all.

Make sure there are no other issues. If you are on Arch Linux, there is a problem with xdg-desktop-portal-gnome that if installed will slowdown loading of many programs.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are a few Firefox forks:

  • LibreWolf
  • Waterfox
  • Arkenfox

And then there is Brave which I find smoother than Firefox, but that's just me.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

+1 for LibreWolf, great Firefox fork

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah but by using brave you are contributing to the browser engine monopoly that chromium has created

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago

And I support Mozilla goal of creating something independent, but I also don't like their engine. Everything using Blink is not automatically a bad thing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, I am 40 plugins all active and they have not changed my browser load time almost at all.

Make sure there are no other issues. If you are on Arch Linux, there is a problem with xdg-desktop-portal-gnome that if installed will slowdown loading of many programs.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That was it thanks.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In my case, xdg-desktop-portal-gnome is required by xdg-desktop-portal, which in turn is required by flatpak. I wonder what effect will removing have on apps?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It means Gnome is the only installed Portal protocol manager. Install one of these first, then remove the Gnome one https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/XDG_Desktop_Portal#List_of_backends_and_interfaces

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As others have said, Librewolf and Waterfox are both forks of Firefox.

That said, i am using Firefox on Fedora from the repos with no issues. Do you use the snap version? Ubuntu ships it default and it is as trash as snaps are in general (it has exactly the problem you stated, taking too long to open). There are guides to install the .deb version (apt installs the snap version...) or you could use flatpak. Another thing to check is if you have a new addon / plugin running thats hogging resources.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Another thing you can try is some kind of caching solution, like profile-sync-daemon that will put your profile in RAM.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

If you're on ubuntu or any of it's derivatives, Firefox is installed via snap by default. Snaps are late to start because of reasons beyond my understanding.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Web is not lightweight. I think Gemini could be better, but it's far from popular. https://drewdevault.com/2020/03/18/Reckless-limitless-scope.html

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I love LibreWolf. It's a Firefox-based privacy browser. You could give Brow.sh a try. A truly remarkable experience :)

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I can't really leave Firefox but use some extensions to try to lighten the experience, like uBlock Origin configured for "hard mode," TabStash with eager discarding turned on, and LocalCDN.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I’ve used NetSurf a bit on low spec machines.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

As others have said, Librewolf is excellent

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Try starting firefox in safe mode. If the load time is still too long then it is not the plugins.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

If you're on ubuntu, try starting it from terminal instead. If it starts immediately, then it's a snap issue. Not sure if it's already been addressed tho

load more comments
view more: next ›